Comparative Environmental Jurisprudence: A Multi-Country Analysis of Rights of Nature Applications
Identification
- Public canonical key
- openalex:w7161926319
- Authors
- Lillian C Johns
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.899161+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-10T16:58:51.370752+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
James Madison University
Reported affiliation countries
US
Documentary abstract — original language
This thesis examines three distinct cases, Ecuador, the United States, and India, in their conceptualization and implementation of the Rights of Nature and environmental jurisprudence. Although the Rights of Nature have gained global traction as a response to accelerating ecological degradation and as a potential legal mechanism for addressing it, issues with implementation and enforcement consistently arise. The outcomes in each case are largely shaped by institutional design, political context, and legal cultures. Ecuador’s constitutional recognition of the Rights of Nature, the United States multilevel recognition, and India’s judicial assertions of ecological personhood represents divergent pathways for articulating environmental rights. Drawing from legal texts, landmark cases, and scholarly debates, this thesis evaluates the defining characteristics and the practical capacity of the Rights of Nature frameworks in influencing environmental governance. Ultimately, the comparative analysis demonstrates that while the Rights of Nature often struggle to function as a standalone legal tool due to varied institutional constraints, it holds potential in a complementary capacity within broader environmental regulatory systems.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W7161926319
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- EC · IN · US
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- Constructing the Rights of Nature: Constitutional Reform, Mobilization, and Environmental Protection in Ecuador · CITES
- The rights of nature in Ecuador: the making of an idea · CITES
- openalex:w2046222962 · CITES
- openalex:w2145005759 · CITES
- openalex:w2151112080 · CITES
- openalex:w2188245729 · CITES
- Somewhere between Rhetoric and Reality: Environmental Constitutionalism and the Rights of Nature in Ecuador · CITES
- openalex:w2755372443 · CITES
- Tipping Point Towards Biodiversity Conservation? Local and Global Consequences of the Application of ‘Rights of Nature’ by Ecuador · CITES
- The rights of nature, Indigenous peoples and international human rights law: from dichotomies to synergies · CITES
- A Wrong Turn with the Rights of Nature Movement · CITES
- openalex:w4389317540 · CITES
0 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Not recorded
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Lillian C Johns. Comparative Environmental Jurisprudence: A Multi-Country Analysis of Rights of Nature Applications. 2026. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-2efbbe8b724e5a74b74c79987f1176eb/
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Lillian C Johns. (2026). Comparative Environmental Jurisprudence: A Multi-Country Analysis of Rights of Nature Applications. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-2efbbe8b724e5a74b74c79987f1176eb/
- Chicago
- Lillian C Johns. Comparative Environmental Jurisprudence: A Multi-Country Analysis of Rights of Nature Applications. 2026. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-2efbbe8b724e5a74b74c79987f1176eb/
- ISO 690
- Lillian C Johns. Comparative Environmental Jurisprudence: A Multi-Country Analysis of Rights of Nature Applications. 2026. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-2efbbe8b724e5a74b74c79987f1176eb/
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Comparative Environmental Jurisprudence: A Multi-Country Analysis of Rights of Nature Applications. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-2efbbe8b724e5a74b74c79987f1176eb/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 51483f7473ffa85c · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.370752+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.370752+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.370752+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.370752+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
c2db3fde2f84948a · 2026-11-09T19:14:42.791263+00:00
340c6076a50332fc · 2026-11-09T19:14:42.791263+00:00
6172bdc19590e221 · 2026-11-09T19:14:42.791263+00:00
1de60159507cbb14 · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.370752+00:00
51483f7473ffa85c · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.370752+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7161926319
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.