Responsabilidad penal de las personas jurídicas: Reformas al COIP del 2021 vs. Principio de proporcionalidad
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.18272/iu.i35.3692
- Authors
- Dayana Lizeth Beltrán Ruiz
- Reported year
- 2025
- Reported language
- es
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:18:28.105911+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:18:28.105911+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
With the reformation of the Código Orgánico Integral Penal in the year 2021, an exclusive system of modifying circumstances of the crime namely, mitigating and aggravating circumstances within the criminal liability of legal persons was implemented. Not foreseeing an exclusive mechanism of application for this new tool, it was remitted into the general rule of increase or reduction of sentences by thirds. Within this context, the investigation addresses the relationship that exists between the modular and the non-modular sentences of the juridical person and the principles of proportionality and determination of said sentence. Finding that most foreseen sentences for juridical persons are of non-modular structure, which prevents its increase or reduction, directly violating the mentioned principles.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W4406815989
- DOI
- 10.18272/iu.i35.3692
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w2070666971 · CITES
- openalex:w4200081828 · CITES
- openalex:w4394829556 · CITES
2 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Dayana Lizeth Beltrán Ruiz. Responsabilidad penal de las personas jurídicas: Reformas al COIP del 2021 vs. Principio de proporcionalidad. 2025. https://doi.org/10.18272/iu.i35.3692
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Dayana Lizeth Beltrán Ruiz. (2025). Responsabilidad penal de las personas jurídicas: Reformas al COIP del 2021 vs. Principio de proporcionalidad. https://doi.org/10.18272/iu.i35.3692
- Chicago
- Dayana Lizeth Beltrán Ruiz. Responsabilidad penal de las personas jurídicas: Reformas al COIP del 2021 vs. Principio de proporcionalidad. 2025. https://doi.org/10.18272/iu.i35.3692
- ISO 690
- Dayana Lizeth Beltrán Ruiz. Responsabilidad penal de las personas jurídicas: Reformas al COIP del 2021 vs. Principio de proporcionalidad. 2025. https://doi.org/10.18272/iu.i35.3692
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Responsabilidad penal de las personas jurídicas: Reformas al COIP del 2021 vs. Principio de proporcionalidad. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-2d697b75b4d892be5b6d736fe359afd7/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version ac2dd5507a925d7f · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:28.105911+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:28.105911+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:28.105911+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:28.105911+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:28.105911+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:28.105911+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
5d49c13e188dd918 · 2026-11-09T19:18:28.105911+00:00
c7a33057e81ab7de · 2026-11-09T19:18:28.105911+00:00
a105a9431baaafd4 · 2026-11-09T19:18:28.105911+00:00
ac2dd5507a925d7f · 2026-11-09T19:18:28.105911+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.18272/iu.i35.3692
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4406815989
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.