UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

A Comparison of the Political Thoughts of Emerson, Thoreau, and Whitman

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.7109/hkjell.199907.0111
Authors
Chi-Yu Chang
Reported year
1999
Reported language
en
Source type
article
First detected
2026-11-09T19:15:09.560221+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:15:09.560221+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

[[abstract]]美國超越主義作家,如愛默生、梭羅、惠特曼等人,所倡導、追尋的是一種類似於小政府式的個人主義,強調接近自然,發揚理性和尊重人權。愛、梭二人崇尚自然或自奉簡約,相信管事最少的政府便是最佳的政府,前者重視人身保障並奠立超越主義的基本主張,後者則以消極手段(如抗稅)反對政府行不義之舉;惠氏被譽爲民主詩人,主張分工合作可造福社會,認爲政府不過是人群的保護者或教化者。三人皆反對蓄奴制。 沒有證據充分顯示這三位超越主義作家曾經受到美國開國先賢的影響,然而不容否認,他們彼此問在理性、自然法、自然權利以及個人主義等問題的看法均頗爲一致,而由於時代背景的影響他們主要的政治觀點與民主理想也多少與自盧梭、洛克以降的憲政主義思潮不謀而合。 身爲超越主義、自然利嚥的力待,愛、梭、惠三人或許是試圖將自然法中神格的理想轉化成爲理性層面的現實運用,以達到人類追求幸福的目的。雖然這種努力於當時並未廣爲接氫其理論基礎也顯屬薄弱,然而由現今的美國民主觀之,他們的努力並不枉然,因爲他們所指陳的理念早已深植人心。 Transcendentalists, such as Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau and Walt Whitman, trying to advocate and pursue American individualism, had their anti-federalist tradition, which was closely related to the notion of a minimal state. In favor of an independent life close to Nature, they laid much emphasis on humanity, reason, and individualism. Loving Nature, the incarnation of God and ultimate value (reason), Emerson and Thoreau were more convinced that the best government was the one that governed least. Emerson, the drafter of transcendentalism, was more concerned about human protection, while Thoreau was stoic in life and tended to defy injustice by means of uncooperative disobedience such as refusal to pay taxes. Regarding human division of labor as something making a society thrive, Whitman would rather consider Government nothing more than a protector or cultivator. There is no evidence that proves American transcendentalists like Emerson, Thoreau, and Whitman to be influenced by American Founding Fathers, but it seems that they, living in the 19th century, had much in common with one another in the notions about reason, the laws of nature, rights of nature, and individualism, and that such political views and ideals might have derived from some of the main ideas of those constitutionalism forerunners such as John Locke. Hued with a deist tendency, these transcendentalists might ever be in an attempt to transform the divine quality of the natural law into a rational one for the pursuit of happiness. Although looking much more like doctrines than theories, their political thoughts may have shown people the way to individual independence and freedom.

Identifiers

OPENALEX
W2275234613
DOI
10.7109/hkjell.199907.0111

Documentary context

Documentary family
Scholarship
Source-reported types
article

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Not recorded
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

Chi-Yu Chang. A Comparison of the Political Thoughts of Emerson, Thoreau, and Whitman. 1999. https://doi.org/10.7109/hkjell.199907.0111

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Chi-Yu Chang. (1999). A Comparison of the Political Thoughts of Emerson, Thoreau, and Whitman. https://doi.org/10.7109/hkjell.199907.0111
Chicago
Chi-Yu Chang. A Comparison of the Political Thoughts of Emerson, Thoreau, and Whitman. 1999. https://doi.org/10.7109/hkjell.199907.0111
ISO 690
Chi-Yu Chang. A Comparison of the Political Thoughts of Emerson, Thoreau, and Whitman. 1999. https://doi.org/10.7109/hkjell.199907.0111

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. A Comparison of the Political Thoughts of Emerson, Thoreau, and Whitman. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-2adbc6cb9d70d178eabd58ea2ae79445/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version 3e1426c3ec1b595d · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:09.560221+00:00
Authors
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:09.560221+00:00
Year
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:09.560221+00:00
Identifiers
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:09.560221+00:00
Source URL
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:15:09.560221+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

731258051d8e6e24 · 2026-11-09T19:15:09.560221+00:00

51c23523445ccfb9 · 2026-11-09T19:15:09.560221+00:00

995754d37f5cfad7 · 2026-11-09T19:15:09.560221+00:00

3e1426c3ec1b595d · 2026-11-09T19:15:09.560221+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

Chi-Yu Chang

Source roles

Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.7109/hkjell.199907.0111

Institutional bibliographic repository · https://irlib.pccu.edu.tw//handle/987654321/22382

Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2275234613

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library