Critical policy studies in dialogue with multispecies perspectives: should it become a more-than-human endeavor?
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1080/19460171.2024.2430396
- Authors
- Séverine van Bommel
- Reported year
- 2024
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.852950+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:11:15.657949+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
The University of Queensland
Reported affiliation countries
AU
Documentary abstract — original language
This forum contribution aims to start a conversation about how multispecies perspectives can broaden the scope of critical policy studies. By addressing three key questions – who speaks, whom do we speak for, and how do we speak for those who are silenced – it examines the power dynamics, ethical considerations, and representational challenges in advocating for nonhuman entities in governance. I discuss frameworks that recognize the rights and agency of nonhuman entities, such as animals, ecosystems, and rivers, with a particular focus on epistemic justice and the inclusion of Indigenous cosmologies that acknowledge the interconnectedness of humans and nonhumans. I also consider the methodological and ethical challenges, including issues of power, representation and informed consent, and explore alternative approaches such as multispecies ethnography to better include nonhuman perspectives. I conclude with three key strategies that can broaden the scope of critical policy studies: making visible silences concerning nonhuman entities in policy; rethinking representation of nonhuman entities in policy; and overcoming silences in representation by adopting reflexive, inclusive methodologies that account for nonhuman interests in policy.
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1080/19460171.2024.2430396
- OPENALEX
- W4404583966
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Natural entities mentioned
- River · Ecosystem
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1508600805 · CITES
- openalex:w161087802 · CITES
- openalex:w1662271756 · CITES
- openalex:w1696284990 · CITES
- openalex:w1964244996 · CITES
- openalex:w1973051082 · CITES
- openalex:w1990304664 · CITES
- openalex:w2006178391 · CITES
- openalex:w2055149041 · CITES
- openalex:w2062258337 · CITES
- openalex:w2103099631 · CITES
- openalex:w2137611289 · CITES
- openalex:w2139332287 · CITES
- openalex:w2167757977 · CITES
- openalex:w2462467938 · CITES
- openalex:w2550981489 · CITES
- openalex:w2583082295 · CITES
- openalex:w2592566478 · CITES
- openalex:w2611246162 · CITES
- openalex:w2617369555 · CITES
2 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Séverine van Bommel. Critical policy studies in dialogue with multispecies perspectives: should it become a more-than-human endeavor?. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2024.2430396
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Séverine van Bommel. (2024). Critical policy studies in dialogue with multispecies perspectives: should it become a more-than-human endeavor?. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2024.2430396
- Chicago
- Séverine van Bommel. Critical policy studies in dialogue with multispecies perspectives: should it become a more-than-human endeavor?. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2024.2430396
- ISO 690
- Séverine van Bommel. Critical policy studies in dialogue with multispecies perspectives: should it become a more-than-human endeavor?. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2024.2430396
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Critical policy studies in dialogue with multispecies perspectives: should it become a more-than-human endeavor?. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-207c5f3ff4569ccfd2bc7cb5ae63f23d/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version b5b47b890c000725 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.657949+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.657949+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.657949+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.657949+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.657949+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.657949+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
3b7064aeb9575c24 · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.657949+00:00
aa22a554f0587da7 · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.657949+00:00
6f49f422b43e0e05 · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.657949+00:00
b5b47b890c000725 · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.657949+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2024.2430396
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4404583966
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.