Conservation and management of sacred groves, myths and beliefs of tribal communities: a case study from north-India
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1186/s40068-014-0016-8
- Authors
- Laxman Singh Kandari · Vinod Kumar Bisht · Meenakshi Bhardwaj · Ashok Kumar Thakur
- Reported year
- 2014
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Haramaya University
Documentary abstract — original language
Traditional and indigenous communities in India are of the religious belief that medicinal groves and plants are sacred in nature. Sacred groves (SGs) are patches of trees on forest land that are protected communally with religious zeal and connotations. These forest areas have been protected since ages by traditional societies and indigenous communities with their socio-cultural and religious practices. Sacred groves as a rule are treated piously. Sacred trees are prohibited from cutting and not axed except when wood is needed for the religious purposes like construction and repair of temple buildings or in cases like worshiping, death ceremonies and temple rituals. Thus, SGs carry direct and everlasting pious status and assist in maintaining social fabric of the society. From the present study it is concluded that, religious identification of medicinal plants and practices have influenced the folklore towards a sense of selfless services in the name the Gods. However, during the course of modernization, mechanization and globalization in the recent past has transformed and weakened both cultural and biological integrity. Changes in social belief, modernization and erosion of cultural practices are some of the major factors contributing towards degradation of the ancient institutional heritage which need to be looked into. The present study is, therefore intended to propose management and conservation as an alternative strategy towards the sustainability of forests around human settlements and also an attempt to explore the role of SGs in conservation and management of different ecosystem services.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W2137893105
- DOI
- 10.1186/s40068-014-0016-8
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- IN
- Natural entities mentioned
- Forest · Ecosystem
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w148118841 · CITES
- openalex:w172557720 · CITES
- openalex:w1827982537 · CITES
- openalex:w1965981338 · CITES
- openalex:w1994851436 · CITES
- openalex:w2001472218 · CITES
- openalex:w2002925768 · CITES
- openalex:w2061901527 · CITES
- openalex:w2097631308 · CITES
- openalex:w2116649841 · CITES
- openalex:w2135708323 · CITES
- openalex:w2162348455 · CITES
- openalex:w2279700749 · CITES
- openalex:w2393307101 · CITES
- openalex:w2470979733 · CITES
- openalex:w2540367345 · CITES
- openalex:w2541462526 · CITES
- openalex:w2769030173 · CITES
- openalex:w2775243929 · CITES
- openalex:w2971375482 · CITES
4 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Laxman Singh Kandari; Vinod Kumar Bisht; Meenakshi Bhardwaj; Ashok Kumar Thakur. Conservation and management of sacred groves, myths and beliefs of tribal communities: a case study from north-India. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-014-0016-8
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Laxman Singh Kandari; Vinod Kumar Bisht; Meenakshi Bhardwaj; Ashok Kumar Thakur. (2014). Conservation and management of sacred groves, myths and beliefs of tribal communities: a case study from north-India. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-014-0016-8
- Chicago
- Laxman Singh Kandari; Vinod Kumar Bisht; Meenakshi Bhardwaj; Ashok Kumar Thakur. Conservation and management of sacred groves, myths and beliefs of tribal communities: a case study from north-India. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-014-0016-8
- ISO 690
- Laxman Singh Kandari; Vinod Kumar Bisht; Meenakshi Bhardwaj; Ashok Kumar Thakur. Conservation and management of sacred groves, myths and beliefs of tribal communities: a case study from north-India. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-014-0016-8
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Conservation and management of sacred groves, myths and beliefs of tribal communities: a case study from north-India. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-1d894d02f53614dfa85647841ebefe2a/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 31cd4c85e6c23fdd · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
e24158ad4ee62ecb · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
f46065c63ba2adaf · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
d8c9a817f24b497e · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
31cd4c85e6c23fdd · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
IN ·
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-014-0016-8
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2137893105
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.