UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

Conservation and management of sacred groves, myths and beliefs of tribal communities: a case study from north-India

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.1186/s40068-014-0016-8
Authors
Laxman Singh Kandari · Vinod Kumar Bisht · Meenakshi Bhardwaj · Ashok Kumar Thakur
Reported year
2014
Reported language
en
Source type
article
First detected
2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Haramaya University

Documentary abstract — original language

Traditional and indigenous communities in India are of the religious belief that medicinal groves and plants are sacred in nature. Sacred groves (SGs) are patches of trees on forest land that are protected communally with religious zeal and connotations. These forest areas have been protected since ages by traditional societies and indigenous communities with their socio-cultural and religious practices. Sacred groves as a rule are treated piously. Sacred trees are prohibited from cutting and not axed except when wood is needed for the religious purposes like construction and repair of temple buildings or in cases like worshiping, death ceremonies and temple rituals. Thus, SGs carry direct and everlasting pious status and assist in maintaining social fabric of the society. From the present study it is concluded that, religious identification of medicinal plants and practices have influenced the folklore towards a sense of selfless services in the name the Gods. However, during the course of modernization, mechanization and globalization in the recent past has transformed and weakened both cultural and biological integrity. Changes in social belief, modernization and erosion of cultural practices are some of the major factors contributing towards degradation of the ancient institutional heritage which need to be looked into. The present study is, therefore intended to propose management and conservation as an alternative strategy towards the sustainability of forests around human settlements and also an attempt to explore the role of SGs in conservation and management of different ecosystem services.

Identifiers

OPENALEX
W2137893105
DOI
10.1186/s40068-014-0016-8

Documentary context

Documentary family
Scholarship
Source-reported types
article
Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
IN
Natural entities mentioned
Forest · Ecosystem

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

  • openalex:w148118841 · CITES
  • openalex:w172557720 · CITES
  • openalex:w1827982537 · CITES
  • openalex:w1965981338 · CITES
  • openalex:w1994851436 · CITES
  • openalex:w2001472218 · CITES
  • openalex:w2002925768 · CITES
  • openalex:w2061901527 · CITES
  • openalex:w2097631308 · CITES
  • openalex:w2116649841 · CITES
  • openalex:w2135708323 · CITES
  • openalex:w2162348455 · CITES
  • openalex:w2279700749 · CITES
  • openalex:w2393307101 · CITES
  • openalex:w2470979733 · CITES
  • openalex:w2540367345 · CITES
  • openalex:w2541462526 · CITES
  • openalex:w2769030173 · CITES
  • openalex:w2775243929 · CITES
  • openalex:w2971375482 · CITES

4 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

Laxman Singh Kandari; Vinod Kumar Bisht; Meenakshi Bhardwaj; Ashok Kumar Thakur. Conservation and management of sacred groves, myths and beliefs of tribal communities: a case study from north-India. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-014-0016-8

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Laxman Singh Kandari; Vinod Kumar Bisht; Meenakshi Bhardwaj; Ashok Kumar Thakur. (2014). Conservation and management of sacred groves, myths and beliefs of tribal communities: a case study from north-India. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-014-0016-8
Chicago
Laxman Singh Kandari; Vinod Kumar Bisht; Meenakshi Bhardwaj; Ashok Kumar Thakur. Conservation and management of sacred groves, myths and beliefs of tribal communities: a case study from north-India. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-014-0016-8
ISO 690
Laxman Singh Kandari; Vinod Kumar Bisht; Meenakshi Bhardwaj; Ashok Kumar Thakur. Conservation and management of sacred groves, myths and beliefs of tribal communities: a case study from north-India. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-014-0016-8

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Conservation and management of sacred groves, myths and beliefs of tribal communities: a case study from north-India. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-1d894d02f53614dfa85647841ebefe2a/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version 31cd4c85e6c23fdd · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
Authors
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
Year
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
Identifiers
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
Source URL
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
Source-reported author ORCID
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

e24158ad4ee62ecb · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00

f46065c63ba2adaf · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00

d8c9a817f24b497e · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00

31cd4c85e6c23fdd · 2026-11-09T19:19:50.281976+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

IN ·

Haramaya University

Ashok Kumar Thakur

Laxman Singh Kandari

Meenakshi Bhardwaj

Vinod Kumar Bisht

Source roles

Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-014-0016-8

Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2137893105

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library