Judicial Review of “Internal Parliamentary Proceedings”: The Dialogic and Non-dialogic Approaches
Identification
- Public canonical key
- openalex:w7082415993
- Authors
- M Jashim Ali Chowdhury
- Reported year
- 2021
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.718947+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.718947+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
This article compares the internal proceedings jurisprudence of the highest courts of the United Kingdom (UK), India, and Bangladesh. Though the Supreme Courts of Bangladesh and India have shown general deference to the debates in parliament, they have shown willingness to lift the veil of those “internal proceedings” that might have constitutional questions involved. It appears that the UK, India, and Bangladesh’s respective models of judicial review and parliament-judiciary relationship influence their internal proceedings jurisprudence. While the Indian and Bangladeshi Supreme Courts’ understandings of the internal proceedings doctrine are conditioned by their self aggrandised posture of guardianship over the Constitution, the British judiciary’s approach is largely dialogic and conciliatory. Indian and Bangladeshi Supreme Courts’ adversarial approach frequently places them in direct confrontation with the legislative and political branches. While the Indian Supreme Court does not shy away from such confrontation, Bangladesh Supreme Court usually tries to avoid it and, in the process, ends up taking fluctuating and self-contradictory positions in different cases. The author argues that the UK’s dialogic model of judicial review provides for a rather congenial basis for principled judicial consideration of the internal proceedings doctrine.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W7082415993
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- BD · GB · IN
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Not recorded
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
M Jashim Ali Chowdhury. Judicial Review of “Internal Parliamentary Proceedings”: The Dialogic and Non-dialogic Approaches. 2021. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-154b6cf0bf96b16b6d23d6515fb0fa9e/
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- M Jashim Ali Chowdhury. (2021). Judicial Review of “Internal Parliamentary Proceedings”: The Dialogic and Non-dialogic Approaches. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-154b6cf0bf96b16b6d23d6515fb0fa9e/
- Chicago
- M Jashim Ali Chowdhury. Judicial Review of “Internal Parliamentary Proceedings”: The Dialogic and Non-dialogic Approaches. 2021. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-154b6cf0bf96b16b6d23d6515fb0fa9e/
- ISO 690
- M Jashim Ali Chowdhury. Judicial Review of “Internal Parliamentary Proceedings”: The Dialogic and Non-dialogic Approaches. 2021. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-154b6cf0bf96b16b6d23d6515fb0fa9e/
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Judicial Review of “Internal Parliamentary Proceedings”: The Dialogic and Non-dialogic Approaches. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-154b6cf0bf96b16b6d23d6515fb0fa9e/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 77f73430c91a2bee · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.718947+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.718947+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.718947+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.718947+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
119ab969ee204fa3 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.718947+00:00
7895644db1c85dcf · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.718947+00:00
8718ecb4b7c6452c · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.718947+00:00
77f73430c91a2bee · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.718947+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7082415993
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.