The Social Construction of Nature: Relativist Accusations, Pragmatist and Critical Realist Responses
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00105
- Authors
- James D. Proctor
- Reported year
- 1998
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:08:22.446693+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:08:22.446693+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
University of California, Santa Barbara
Documentary abstract — original language
Social constructivists argue that what we call “nature” isfar less universal and extrahuman than generally assumed. Yet this argument has been vigorously attacked by some natural scientists and other scholars due to what they perceive as its dangerous flirtation with relativism. I introduce this debate by reference to a recent controversy over the concept of wilderness, an important icon of nature in North America. I then define several forms of relativism, and compare two contemporary bodies of thought that are in broad agreement with social constructivism, yet do not promote strong forms of relativism: critical realism and pragmatism. For its part, critical realism is marked by a qualified, though vigorous, rejection of strong forms of relativism in understanding nature, whereas pragmatism involves more of an agnostic response, a sense that the so-called problem of relativism is not as serious as critics of the social-construction-of-nature argument would believe. Taken together, the two approaches offer more than either one alone, as they both suggest important truths about nature, albeit generally at different scales. Ultimately, pragmatists and critical realists alike admit that allknowledges are partial and a certain degree of relativism is thus unavoidable; yet they both, in a sort of tense complementarity, point to ways that geographers and others whose business and concern it is to represent nature can indeed have something to say.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W2057716127
- DOI
- 10.1111/0004-5608.00105
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1481325389 · CITES
- openalex:w1484964519 · CITES
- openalex:w1485474662 · CITES
- openalex:w1503474447 · CITES
- openalex:w1505563434 · CITES
- openalex:w1512457525 · CITES
- openalex:w1551320767 · CITES
- openalex:w1561273879 · CITES
- openalex:w1567871163 · CITES
- openalex:w1571189606 · CITES
- openalex:w1580490102 · CITES
- openalex:w1586865077 · CITES
- openalex:w1597750586 · CITES
- openalex:w1601300738 · CITES
- openalex:w1620408265 · CITES
- openalex:w1755702162 · CITES
- openalex:w1760222096 · CITES
- openalex:w176062676 · CITES
- openalex:w1792331941 · CITES
- openalex:w1961898237 · CITES
1 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
James D. Proctor. The Social Construction of Nature: Relativist Accusations, Pragmatist and Critical Realist Responses. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00105
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- James D. Proctor. (1998). The Social Construction of Nature: Relativist Accusations, Pragmatist and Critical Realist Responses. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00105
- Chicago
- James D. Proctor. The Social Construction of Nature: Relativist Accusations, Pragmatist and Critical Realist Responses. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00105
- ISO 690
- James D. Proctor. The Social Construction of Nature: Relativist Accusations, Pragmatist and Critical Realist Responses. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00105
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. The Social Construction of Nature: Relativist Accusations, Pragmatist and Critical Realist Responses. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-0ab9218e2e32ae8ab087aef65d342803/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 107c816ded050ae9 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:22.446693+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:22.446693+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:22.446693+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:22.446693+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:22.446693+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:22.446693+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
d584412d82488c9d · 2026-11-09T19:08:22.446693+00:00
2dbd87d8f2bd98c1 · 2026-11-09T19:08:22.446693+00:00
f4066c816fdf2e87 · 2026-11-09T19:08:22.446693+00:00
107c816ded050ae9 · 2026-11-09T19:08:22.446693+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
University of California, Santa Barbara
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00105
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2057716127
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.