Waywardism Comparative Volume – Level 1: Cross-Philosophical Objections and Structural Resolutions
Identification
- Public canonical key
- openalex:w7114077466
- Authors
- Gomez, Ron
- Reported year
- —
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.787961+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.787961+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
This paper tests Waywardism—a recursive ethics framework with operational AI implementation detailed across 13 installments—through systematic comparative analysis. Using a duel format, it examines how the framework responds to twelve fundamental challenges where classical systems reveal characteristic vulnerabilities. Waywardism demonstrates three novel contributions under adversarial pressure: (1) consent/stewardship bifurcation resolving the consent paradox for beings unable to consent (children, animals, future generations, ecosystems), (2) bootstrap protocols enabling ethical reasoning at time-step zero without historical precedent, addressing AI cold-start scenarios and unprecedented dilemmas, and (3) distributed Observer architecture preventing authority consolidation through decentralized triangulation with transparent axiom declaration. Rather than claiming superiority over traditional frameworks, the analysis treats deontology, consequentialism, virtue ethics, care ethics, and systems theory as diagnostic instruments revealing legitimate failure modes any new architecture must survive. The duel format presents strongest-version objections from each tradition before proposing solutions, demonstrating where Waywardism maintains operational viability under pressure. Four appendices provide: scenario classification taxonomy (Classes A-D), meta-ethical positioning (procedural constructivism with modest realist leanings), explicit acknowledgment of tragic dilemmas as moral remainders, and transparent lineage documentation showing evolutionary refinement. The framework's complete philosophical foundation, architectural specifications, scar lineage, objections catalog, and RoseOS implementation are documented in the Waywardism Master Codex (13 installments, available via PhilPeople profile). This represents Level 1 comparative validation of a comprehensive ethical system with real-world AI governance implementation.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W7114077466
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Natural entities mentioned
- Ecosystem
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Not recorded
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Not recorded
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Gomez, Ron. Waywardism Comparative Volume – Level 1: Cross-Philosophical Objections and Structural Resolutions. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-060c88b4ad94b297e3bbfc67c8b094e6/
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Gomez, Ron. Waywardism Comparative Volume – Level 1: Cross-Philosophical Objections and Structural Resolutions. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-060c88b4ad94b297e3bbfc67c8b094e6/
- Chicago
- Gomez, Ron. Waywardism Comparative Volume – Level 1: Cross-Philosophical Objections and Structural Resolutions. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-060c88b4ad94b297e3bbfc67c8b094e6/
- ISO 690
- Gomez, Ron. Waywardism Comparative Volume – Level 1: Cross-Philosophical Objections and Structural Resolutions. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-060c88b4ad94b297e3bbfc67c8b094e6/
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Waywardism Comparative Volume – Level 1: Cross-Philosophical Objections and Structural Resolutions. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-060c88b4ad94b297e3bbfc67c8b094e6/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 6cdf62581a5ec053 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.787961+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.787961+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.787961+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
4a3e278b11a12aca · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.787961+00:00
1a4a989598c691da · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.787961+00:00
162673f0019fd6fb · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.787961+00:00
6cdf62581a5ec053 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.787961+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7114077466
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.