ACKNOWLEDGING NATURE’S INTRINSIC RIGHTS THROUGH BIOPHILIC CONSTITUTIONALISM
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.2139/ssrn.5276775
- Authors
- Rawnak Miraj Ul Azam
- Reported year
- 2025
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.942273+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:11:15.666451+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
American International University-Bangladesh
Reported affiliation countries
BD
Documentary abstract — original language
This research explores Biophilic Constitutionalism, a framework in tegrating biocentric/eco-centric values into legal orders to recognise nature’s intrinsic rights. While existing literature extensively debates the philosophy of nature’s rights, it lacks practical guidance for imple mentation, particularly internationally. This study investigates: (1) How can Biophilic Constitutionalism be effectively integrated into legal frameworks? and (2) What institutional mechanisms can balance human needs with nature’s rights? Using a mixed-methods approach, this research combines legal doctrinal analysis, comparative case studies (e.g., Ecuador, New Zealand), and environmental ethics theory. It exam ines legal instruments, case law, and governance structures, identifying best practices and implementation challenges. The study analyses the potential of “Guardians for Nature” and explores the feasibility of an International Environmental Court. Findings reveal uneven imple mentation of nature’s rights due to conflicting human interests. Key challenges include defining nature’s rights, establishing representation, and reconciling ecological needs with development. The study proposes a Biophilic Constitutionalism framework, emphasising comprehensive legal standing for nature, participatory governance, and the “principle of ecological necessity.” This research contributes a comprehensive framework for implementing Biophilic Constitutionalism nationally and internationally, offering practical guidance for policymakers and activists. Its findings have significant implications for environmental law and policy, potentially improving biodiversity and ecosystem protection.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W4410961312
- DOI
- 10.2139/ssrn.5276775 · 10.69648/dewo1699
- OPENAIRE
- doi_dedup___::c985bc9ab895fb95f2a605d10f5e74b1
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- Article · article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- EC · NZ
- Natural entities mentioned
- Ecosystem
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5276775
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.69648/dewo1699
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4410961312
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1530567397 · CITES
- openalex:w1585393447 · CITES
- openalex:w2028514556 · CITES
- openalex:w2085541825 · CITES
- Should Trees Have Standing?: Law, Morality, and the Environment · CITES
- openalex:w6634284522 · CITES
- openalex:w6820875357 · CITES
- openalex:w7005993776 · CITES
- openalex:w7075369041 · CITES
1 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Provenance unresolved
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Provenance unresolved
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Rawnak Miraj Ul Azam. ACKNOWLEDGING NATURE’S INTRINSIC RIGHTS THROUGH BIOPHILIC CONSTITUTIONALISM. 2025. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-01584b663186c6f5d3e4e5b1a74e6fcd/
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Rawnak Miraj Ul Azam. (2025). ACKNOWLEDGING NATURE’S INTRINSIC RIGHTS THROUGH BIOPHILIC CONSTITUTIONALISM. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-01584b663186c6f5d3e4e5b1a74e6fcd/
- Chicago
- Rawnak Miraj Ul Azam. ACKNOWLEDGING NATURE’S INTRINSIC RIGHTS THROUGH BIOPHILIC CONSTITUTIONALISM. 2025. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-01584b663186c6f5d3e4e5b1a74e6fcd/
- ISO 690
- Rawnak Miraj Ul Azam. ACKNOWLEDGING NATURE’S INTRINSIC RIGHTS THROUGH BIOPHILIC CONSTITUTIONALISM. 2025. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-01584b663186c6f5d3e4e5b1a74e6fcd/
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. ACKNOWLEDGING NATURE’S INTRINSIC RIGHTS THROUGH BIOPHILIC CONSTITUTIONALISM. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-01584b663186c6f5d3e4e5b1a74e6fcd/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 2b5a80e9c7c886bc · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:20.665038+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.666451+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:20.665038+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.666451+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:20.665038+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.666451+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:20.665038+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.666451+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:20.665038+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.666451+00:00 - Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.666451+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
66e210d7524a1a5b · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.666451+00:00
8853f8e187a18300 · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.666451+00:00
712b8f25ee2b0dfa · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.666451+00:00
2b5a80e9c7c886bc · 2026-11-09T19:11:15.666451+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
American International University-Bangladesh
Source roles
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5276775
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.69648/dewo1699
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4410961312
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.