UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

การบังคับใช้กฎหมายของศาลปกครองในสหภาพยุโรปกรณีศึกษาศาลปกครองในประเทศฝรั่งเศสและเยอรมนี

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-fd39d857c25fc8042910b80b3c99a687

Auteurs

ธงพล พรหมสาขา ณ สกลนคร

Année déclarée

—

Langue déclarée

th

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-14T02:41:04.374179+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-14T02:41:04.374179+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

This article describes the issues and development processes of administrative court enforcement in the European Union, along with case studies of administrative courts in France and Germany. The legal enforcement problems of administrative courts in the European Union, France, and Germany are complex in terms of interpretation and conflict with national law. In the European Union, law enforcement must consider compliance with Union law; in France, administrative courts are strict in regulating the powers of the executive branch, while in Germany, the court system emphasizes the protection of civil rights and strict adherence to constitutional law. As for the development process of administrative court enforcement in the European Union, France and Germany show a trend toward greater transparency and efficiency. In the European Union, administrative courts play an important role in ensuring the consistency of national and Union law, especially in the areas of human rights and the common market. France has developed a stronger role for administrative courts in monitoring the exercise of state power, while Germany focuses on developing a justice system that protects citizens' rights and freedoms and adheres to the principles of constitutional law. Courts in France and Germany are continually improving in response to social and political changes.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W7119012946

DOI

10.14456/issc.2024.76

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ISSC/article/view/274462

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.