UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Czy klauzula nadzwyczajnej zmiany stosunków ulegnie „nadzwyczajnej zmianie”? Neoinstytucjonalny paradygmat klauzuli rebus sic stantibus w obliczu multikryzysu

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-fbb4aaf3aa6e3e6fe914955b806aa2fa

Auteurs

Filip Wyszyński

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-13T09:03:03.445748+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-13T09:03:03.445748+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Recently, we have observed the phenomenon of multi-crisis, a multicausative crisis characterized by uncertainty and unpredictability in social life, including economic life. During this period of extraordinary volatility, the rebus sic stantibus clause is gaining importance. This multi-crisis forces a redefinition of the clause and a paradigm shift in its functionality. The aim of this study is to examine this clause in circumstances of extraordinary change. The premise of this research is to confront the clause within the framework of new institutional economics, which is becoming a research method in the economic analysis of law. This redefinition of the clause may occur against the backdrop of broader paradigm shifts and phenomena such as protectionism, deglobalization, and digitalization, and consequently, changes in the axiology of law. This study undertakes an analysis that goes beyond the standard dogmatic analysis of the legal institution of the rebus sic stantibus clause, but addresses the axiological and paradigmatic level within the legal system (the division of private law into civil and commercial law, the unification of law, the growing importance of soft law, and the privatization of public law). It seems that the rebus sic stantibus clause may acquire a broader axiological significance in the justice perspective.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W7170889312

DOI

10.36128/hpy5n926

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.36128/hpy5n926

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.