UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

IL TRATTAMENTO MEDICO-PSICHIATRICO IN ITALIA: LA LEGGE E LA PRASSI

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-ede8a904dbe92850001c51eb9a5ac1be

Auteurs

Enrico Daly · Margareth Vetis Zaganelli

Année déclarée

2025

Langue déclarée

it

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-14T01:59:25.018140+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-14T01:59:25.018140+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

University of Milano-Bicocca · Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

BR · IT

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

The aim of this article is to describe and investigate the evolution (or involution, depending on the different points of view) of the institution of compulsory health treatment for mental illness in Italy. The legal coordinates of this treatment were established by law no. 180/1978, the so-called Basaglia law. The interpretations to which the law was subjected in practice produced an increase in the coercive space in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. The resulting "new" treatments, however, present some significant problems of compatibility not only with the provisions of the law, but also with constitutional provisions. The result of the analysis of administrative practices (the actions of territorial public services) and judicial practices leads to the conclusion that in Italy, despite Basaglia's teachings and intentions, the scope for coercion and the use of force have increased significantly, so much so that it is doubtful whether the recent legislation on informed consent will actually be respected in relation to psychiatric patients.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W4411786288

DOI

10.5935/2317-2622/direitomackenzie.v18n216563it

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Éditeurs

Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.5935/2317-2622/direitomackenzie.v18n216563it

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.