UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Participatory Communication as a Strategy for Empowering Indigenous Communities in Customary Land Rights Legislation

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.55885/jucep.v6i1.1032

Auteurs

Tetti Nauli Panjaitan · Hilarius Bambang Winarko

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:17:18.760007+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:17:18.760007+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

University of Bunda Mulia

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

This study examines participatory communication practices in the legislative process concerning customary land rights (tanah ulayat) of the Batak Toba indigenous law community, particularly in the implementation of Regional Regulation of Toba Regency Number 1 of 2020. Customary land rights possess not only economic value but also cultural, historical, and collective identity dimensions. However, in legislative practice, indigenous communities often do not receive equal opportunities for participation. This research employs a qualitative approach with a case study method in four agrarian conflict areas: Sigapiton, Lumban Sitorus, West Lumbanrau, and Gurgur Aek Raja. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and analysis of legal documents and media sources. Data analysis was conducted using the Miles and Huberman model as well as thematic analysis. The findings reveal that communication in the legislative process remains elitist and has not been fully dialogical. Structural barriers in the form of bureaucratic dominance and cultural barriers arising from differences in value systems weaken indigenous community participation. This study proposes a participatory communication model based on local wisdom that emphasizes deliberative dialogue, customary deliberation, and equality of participation. These findings contribute to the development of participatory communication theory within the context of legal pluralism and provide practical recommendations for the formulation of inclusive policies.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7166686663

DOI

10.55885/jucep.v6i1.1032

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.55885/jucep.v6i1.1032
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7166686663

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1578221581 · CITES
• openalex:w2101319329 · CITES
• openalex:w2336343962 · CITES
• openalex:w2342298884 · CITES
• openalex:w2462084173 · CITES
• openalex:w2470974333 · CITES
• openalex:w2593836205 · CITES
• openalex:w2734951906 · CITES
• openalex:w2766261269 · CITES
• ‘Beyond Human Ownership’? Property, Power and Legal Personality for Nature in Aotearoa New Zealand · CITES
• openalex:w2786953788 · CITES
• openalex:w2792957341 · CITES
• openalex:w2808660741 · CITES
• openalex:w2890066665 · CITES
• openalex:w2912963408 · CITES
• openalex:w2943162517 · CITES
• openalex:w2955306099 · CITES
• openalex:w3013655291 · CITES
• openalex:w3021017024 · CITES
• openalex:w3080401601 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.