UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Aligning Mercury Governance With Livelihoods, Legal Frameworks, and Religious Norms: Evidence from Indonesia’s ASGM

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-e9744bc263b4f71866c92f8d0389bb46

Auteurs

Amanda Adelina Harun · Vanessa Veronica · Fenty Usman Puluhulawa

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-14T02:31:28.943981+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-14T02:31:28.943981+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

State University of Gorontalo · Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

ID · NL

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

This study aims to examine the health impacts of mercury exposure on miners and communities, analyse patterns of regulatory compliance in the context of largely informal mining, and evaluate the effectiveness of policies and legal instruments designed to reduce mercury use and mitigate environmental impacts. This study synthesises toxicological and biomonitoring evidence, community-based qualitative studies on practices and risk perceptions, and regulatory analysis in relation to international obligations. Results show that mercury biomarkers remain persistently high and there are neurological impacts on exposed populations, while informality limits oversight and weakens compliance. Interventions focused on enforcement often trigger displacement of activities (mining), rather than changes to more sustainable extraction practices. Policy effectiveness increases when regulations are combined with livelihood-sensitive supporting factors, including cooperative-based formalisation, access to financing and training, and technological transition through integrated governance. The study proposes a governance-livelihood-Islamic norm model and a compliance architecture aligned with maqasid al-sharia.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W7128395334

DOI

10.21154/justicia.v23i1.12274

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Éditeurs

STAIN Ponorogo

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v23i1.12274

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.