Deception and Self-Deception in Symbolic Legislation: from Virtue Signalling to Epistemic Vices
Identification
- Clé publique
- radar:r-e8787c3af9e17adfc66551f2fcc01edb
- Auteurs
- Francesco Ferraro
- Année déclarée
- 2026
- Langue déclarée
- en
- Type source
- article
- Première détection
- 2026-11-14T02:46:35.637763+00:00
- Dernière observation des métadonnées
- 2026-11-14T02:46:35.637763+00:00
- Dernière vérification HTTP
- Non effectuée
Institutions déclarées par la source
University of Milan
Pays d’affiliation déclarés
IT
Résumé documentaire — langue originale
Abstract “Symbolic legislation” is often used to refer to laws that are ineffective, that is, instrumentally inadequate in achieving their declared or expected purposes. It is often associated with lawmakers deceiving citizens about their actual aims, as when they legislate only to alleviate social pressure rather than to address social problems. However, more often than not, symbolic legislation involves no legislative intent to deceive, as when a law is not symbolic from the outset but becomes so later. A novel definition of “symbolic legislation” will be offered, making no reference to irrationality or deception and focusing instead on the prevalence of symbolic functions. These functions are those that laws perform when they are not interpreted according to legal-specialistic codes but according to different codes provided by extra-legal social norms. A classification of these functions is proposed, based on whether they rely entirely on pre-existing codes (as in symbolic signalling, including virtue signalling) or modify those codes by creating new symbols or changing their social meanings. In some cases, the prevalence of symbolic functions overshadows the laws’ lack of effectiveness: citizens are led by “expressive” concerns into what Newig has called “societal self-deception” regarding the instrumental adequacy of the laws they support. Although various alternative accounts of self-deception have been offered, it will be held that, when symbolic legislation is associated with societal self-deception, it fosters the propagation of identifiable epistemic vices within the community.
Identifiants
- OPENALEX
- https://openalex.org/W7135048878
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11196-026-10465-2
Repères documentaires
- Famille documentaire
- article
- Types déclarés par les sources
- article
- Éditeurs
- Springer Science+Business Media
Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.
Sources
OpenAlex · Document 1
Citer cette référence
Francesco Ferraro. Deception and Self-Deception in Symbolic Legislation: from Virtue Signalling to Epistemic Vices. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-026-10465-2
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690 : formats bibliographiques fondés sur les champs disponibles. OSCOLA / Bluebook : données structurées uniquement ; aucune conformité juridique complète n’est revendiquée sans vérification des éléments nécessaires.
- APA
- Francesco Ferraro. (2026). Deception and Self-Deception in Symbolic Legislation: from Virtue Signalling to Epistemic Vices. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-026-10465-2
- Chicago
- Francesco Ferraro. Deception and Self-Deception in Symbolic Legislation: from Virtue Signalling to Epistemic Vices. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-026-10465-2
- ISO 690
- Francesco Ferraro. Deception and Self-Deception in Symbolic Legislation: from Virtue Signalling to Epistemic Vices. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-026-10465-2
Warning: Undefined array key "last_link_verified" in /home/clients/e27d81e12f04d2bfd747aa264540ac56/sites/_UDTR_APP/legal_library_reference.php on line 31
UDTR — Bibliothèque juridique mondiale des droits de la Nature. Deception and Self-Deception in Symbolic Legislation: from Virtue Signalling to Epistemic Vices. Notice documentaire: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-e8787c3af9e17adfc66551f2fcc01edb/ · Dernière vérification HTTP : non effectuée
Données de cette version figée
Dossiers et relations documentaires
Rôles des sources
Source bibliographique / publication d’origine · https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-026-10465-2
Un lien vers une autorité ne prouve pas à lui seul une affirmation juridique. Les résumés et les textes intégraux restent soumis aux conditions de leur source.
Statut documentaire
Pertinence à examiner
Bibliothèque
Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.