UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Implementing REDD through community‐based forest management: Lessons from T anzania

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.1111/1477-8947.12018

Auteurs

ELIZABETH J. Z. ROBINSON · Heidi Joanne Albers · Charles K. Meshack · Razack Bakari Lokina

Année déclarée

2013

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:13:14.430757+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:13:14.430757+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Oregon State University · University of Dar es Salaam · University of Reading

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Abstract REDD (reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation) aims to slow carbon releases caused by forest disturbance by making payments conditional on forest quality over time. Like earlier policies to slow deforestation, REDD must change the behaviour of forest degrading actors. Broadly, it can be implemented with payments to forest users in exchange for improved forest management, thus creating incentives; through payments for enforcement, thus creating disincentives; or through addressing external drivers such as urban charcoal demand. In Tanzania, community‐based forest management (CBFM), a form of participatory forest management, was chosen by the Tanzania Forest Conservation Group, a local NGO, as a model for implementing REDD pilot programmes. Payments are made to villages that have the rights to forest carbon. In exchange, the villages must demonstrably reduce deforestation at the village level. In this paper, using this pilot programme as a case study, combined with a review of the literature, we provide insights for REDD implementation in sub‐Saharan Africa. We pay particular attention to leakage, monitoring and enforcement. We suggest that implementing REDD through CBFM‐type structures can create appropriate incentives and behaviour change when the recipients of the REDD funds are also the key drivers of forest change. When external forces drive forest change, however, REDD through CBFM‐type structures becomes an enforcement programme with local communities rather than government agencies being responsible for the enforcement. That structure imposes costs on local communities, whose local authority limits the ability to address leakage outside the particular REDD village.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W1489164518

DOI

10.1111/1477-8947.12018

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Forêt

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12018
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W1489164518

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1481889585 · CITES
• openalex:w1519979875 · CITES
• openalex:w1558737582 · CITES
• openalex:w1564272830 · CITES
• openalex:w1588785472 · CITES
• openalex:w1598376081 · CITES
• openalex:w1756902206 · CITES
• openalex:w177227996 · CITES
• openalex:w186269170 · CITES
• openalex:w1878128147 · CITES
• openalex:w1912465158 · CITES
• openalex:w1971328015 · CITES
• openalex:w1971347574 · CITES
• openalex:w1974491836 · CITES
• openalex:w1975556419 · CITES
• openalex:w1979125495 · CITES
• openalex:w1980814876 · CITES
• openalex:w1987410764 · CITES
• openalex:w2001543067 · CITES
• openalex:w2004475311 · CITES

3 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.