UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

The challenges of collective PES: Insights from three community-based models in Vietnam

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101438

Auteurs

Van Thi Hai Nguyen · Pamela D. McElwee · Hue Thi Van Le · Tuyen Phuong Nghiem · Huong Thi Dieu Vu

Année déclarée

2022

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:15:59.281801+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:15:59.281801+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · University of Lausanne · VNU Central Institute for Natural Resources and Environmental Studies · Vietnam National University, Hanoi

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Vietnam has adopted a national Payment for Forest Environmental Services (PES) policy, which while primarily paying individual households for forest protection, has been flexible enough to allow for collective PES models to also arise. Such collective models have the potential to reduce transaction costs, avoid motivation crowding, and protect common-pool resources like community forests. This paper analyzes three different types of collective PES models that have been tried in Vietnam: community land titles and PES payments to whole villages; group titles and PES payments to collections of households; and collective patrolling with payment contracts but without land tenure rights. We draw on fieldwork across three provinces to examine how these different forms of collective PES have arisen, and how they have articulated with existing forest governance institutions and local social characteristics. We also assess what the advantages and disadvantages for each model are. Overall, we argue that none of Vietnam's collective PES models have achieved unqualified success in generating positive collective action outcomes, and each has challenges that have undermined group efforts, exacerbated underlying problems, or even created new conflicts. Based on our assessment, achieving a mix of individual (primarily financial) benefits together with collective rights and benefits is important for both social cohesion and forest protection. As a result, improving existing local institutional capacities and reinforcing group cohesion to achieve collective action success remain needed within Vietnam’s collective PES models.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W4281763892

DOI

10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101438

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

VN

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Forêt

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101438
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4281763892

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1836765585 · CITES
• openalex:w1878156459 · CITES
• openalex:w1967062992 · CITES
• openalex:w1971999535 · CITES
• openalex:w1972919944 · CITES
• openalex:w1975590726 · CITES
• openalex:w1981455352 · CITES
• openalex:w1982251002 · CITES
• From legal acts to actual powers: Devolution and property rights in the Central Highlands of Vietnam · CITES
• openalex:w2037568431 · CITES
• openalex:w2039774324 · CITES
• openalex:w2041261148 · CITES
• openalex:w2044164494 · CITES
• openalex:w2058811880 · CITES
• openalex:w2060702958 · CITES
• openalex:w2062485867 · CITES
• openalex:w2062491943 · CITES
• openalex:w2077742508 · CITES
• openalex:w2084496989 · CITES
• openalex:w2085418263 · CITES

2 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.