UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Draft Convention on Recoverability and Civilizational Continuity — Version 2.0, Universal Corpus Integration Edition

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-e595853e777ec03d4aeb7e4cc9f49bbb

Auteurs

Interval Studio · Noelia Sanchez

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

report

Première détection

2026-11-14T02:13:49.960354+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-14T02:13:49.960354+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

The Draft Convention on Recoverability and Civilizational Continuity (UCCRHC-TREATY-001) is a model treaty and international-adoption instrument developed within the Continuity Science / Recoverability-Constrained Systems (RCS) research programme and the broader Universal Recoverability Constitution (UCCRHC-001) architecture. The Convention is designed as a treaty-oriented route for translating recoverability-constrained governance into legislative, administrative, judicial, institutional, technical, and international-cooperation mechanisms. Its central purpose is to reduce materially avoidable irreversible harm while preserving truthful distinction, lawful agency, traceable responsibility, effective remedy, and timely, executable recovery paths across materially consequential transitions. Recoverability is treated as the practical capacity, within the relevant interval and under real conditions, to prevent, challenge, contain, correct, restore, substitute, compensate, re-enter, or otherwise preserve a protected state. The Convention therefore evaluates not only an action itself but also the authority behind it, affected rights and identities, evidence, dependencies, cumulative effects, successor structures, time-to-non-recoverability, restoration capacity, and the practical availability of remedy. The Convention includes provisions addressing general implementation duties; agency, consent, and lawful authority; effective remedy; successor and handoff continuity; cross-domain and systemic effects; science, technology, artificial intelligence, and automated systems; healthcare and human continuity; environmental and future-generation protection; essential services and critical dependencies; children and persons requiring heightened protection; emergency powers; international cooperation; national implementation; periodic reporting; and institutional review through a Committee on Recoverability and Continuity. Version 2.0 expands the treaty architecture through integration of the broader UCCRHC and Recoverability-Constrained Systems corpus. It incorporates materially distinct principles and implementation routes concerning identity and consent continuity, evidence and provenance, foundation-first access, financial and resource continuity, beneficial-control attribution, planetary stewardship, artificial intelligence, biological and healthcare systems, communications, software and hardware, quantum and future-developed technologies, interruption and succession, recovery-of-recovery, common-mode failure, adversarial closure, recursive governance, and living-system reopening. The Convention distinguishes technical or operational capability from lawful authority. Silence, incapacity, dependence, inability to resist, technical access, or mere contact do not by themselves create consent, and automated outputs do not independently create constitutional or international authority. The instrument is intended to complement, rather than weaken, stronger protections available under applicable domestic or international law. It is a draft model convention and negotiating text. Publication does not create State consent to be bound, treaty entry into force, governmental adoption, United Nations endorsement, or binding international law. Legal effect would depend on applicable international-law processes and lawful adoption by competent authorities.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W7213624858

DOI

10.5281/zenodo.22850321

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Rapport — provenance institutionnelle à préciser

Types déclarés par les sources

report

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22850321

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.