UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Feminist Institutionalist Interpretation of Forest Tenure Regimes in Nepal

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.3126/jfl.v15i1.23095

Auteurs

Radha Wagle · Deepa Oli · Basana Sapkota · Saraswati Aryal · Sabina Maiya Prajapati

Année déclarée

2017

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:13:38.728183+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:13:38.728183+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

ActionAid · Monash University

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Forest tenure reform is one of the key agenda for sustainable forest governance. But forest tenure is not gender neutral. We examine various forest tenure regimes of Nepal from feminist institutionalist approach and explore, to what extent, each regime recognises the right of women to forest tenure. Five community-based forest tenure regimes, namely community forest, pro-poor leasehold forest, collaborative forest, buffer zone community forest and conservation area are taken into account for assessing gender dimension. Historical changes and continuity are presented in forestry governance in terms of women’s bundle of rights over forest resources across three key phases – before 1950s, from 1950s to 1970s and from 1970s onward. Formal and informal institutions in each of the five tenure regimes were analysed and we found that the formal institutions in community forestry recognises the roles of the women in forest tenure, but those in other regimes and informal rules in all the regimes, by and large, prevent women from having access to and control over forest resource decisions. Emerging aspects of forestry, mainly forest-based enterprises and REDD+ have not been able to address gender issues properly. Some recommendations are made for gender equality in forest tenure regimes.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W2921785848

DOI

10.3126/jfl.v15i1.23095

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

NP

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Forêt

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.3126/jfl.v15i1.23095
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W2921785848

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1899501942 · CITES
• openalex:w1922948941 · CITES
• openalex:w1975173648 · CITES
• openalex:w1982375826 · CITES
• openalex:w2005066455 · CITES
• openalex:w2020594458 · CITES
• openalex:w2077771621 · CITES
• openalex:w2092365764 · CITES
• openalex:w2096161807 · CITES
• openalex:w2096803083 · CITES
• Gender and Sustainable Forest Management in East Africa and Latin America · CITES
• openalex:w2111741047 · CITES
• openalex:w2141513161 · CITES
• Gender Equality Challenges to the REDD+ Initiative in Nepal · CITES
• openalex:w2153741325 · CITES
• openalex:w2292753161 · CITES
• openalex:w4213166689 · CITES
• openalex:w4236476203 · CITES
• openalex:w4255747494 · CITES
• openalex:w4300605200 · CITES

1 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.