UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Justice and conservation: The need to incorporate recognition

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.021

Auteurs

Adrian Martin · Brendan Coolsaet · Esteve Corbera · Neil M. Dawson · James A. Fraser · Ina Lehmann · Iokiñe Rodríguez

Année déclarée

2016

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:15:59.282845+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:15:59.282845+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Lancaster University · UCLouvain · Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · University of East Anglia

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

In light of the Aichi target to manage protected areas equitably by 2020, we ask how the conservation sector should be incorporating concerns for social justice. We focus in particular on ‘recognition’, because it is the least well understood aspect of environmental justice, and yet highly relevant to conservation because of its concern with respect for local knowledge and cultures. In order to explore the meaning of recognition in the conservation context, we take four main steps. First, we identify four components of recognition to serve as our analytical framework: subjects of justice, the harms that constitute injustice, the mechanisms that produce injustices, and the responses to alleviate these. Secondly, we apply this framework to explore four traditions of thinking about recognition: Hegelian intersubjectivity, critical theory, southern decolonial theory, and the capabilities approach. Thirdly, we provide three case studies of conservation conflicts highlighting how different theoretical perspectives are illustrated in the claims and practices of real world conservation struggles. Fourthly, we finish the paper by drawing out some key differences between traditions of thinking, but also important areas of convergence. The convergences provide a basis for concluding that conservation should look beyond a distributive model of justice to incorporate concerns for social recognition, including careful attention to ways to pursue equality of status for local conservation stakeholders. This will require reflection on working practices and looking at forms of intercultural engagement that, for example, respect alternative ways of relating to nature and biodiversity.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W2321271692

DOI

10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.021

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.021
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W2321271692

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1497460133 · CITES
• openalex:w1498172056 · CITES
• openalex:w1500164099 · CITES
• openalex:w1508237279 · CITES
• openalex:w1512901091 · CITES
• openalex:w1531940348 · CITES
• openalex:w1535803599 · CITES
• openalex:w1543804263 · CITES
• openalex:w1545096067 · CITES
• openalex:w1552262866 · CITES
• openalex:w1556152334 · CITES
• openalex:w1564517964 · CITES
• openalex:w1572553204 · CITES
• openalex:w1587115758 · CITES
• openalex:w1589800138 · CITES
• openalex:w1595103715 · CITES
• openalex:w1597183254 · CITES
• openalex:w1597421676 · CITES
• openalex:w1601549511 · CITES
• openalex:w1694882348 · CITES

26 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Publication académique détectée

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.