UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

E. B. Pashukanis on Terrorism, Political Crime, and International Law: The Copenhagen Congress of 1935

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-df837083570e8cc2405096d9e6b1e08e

Auteurs

Igor Shoikhedbrod · Bjarne Melkevik

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-14T02:02:44.516442+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-14T02:02:44.516442+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

St. Francis Xavier University · Université Laval

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

CA

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Drawing on a newly discovered transcript of E. B. Pashukanis’s speech and a selection of his documented interventions at the 6th International Conference for the Unification of Criminal Law in Copenhagen (1935), this article examines Pashukanis’s neglected treatment of international criminal law, as well as his conceptualisations of political crimes, extradition, the right to asylum, and the nature of modern terrorism. The article also sheds light on Pashukanis’s reflections on the composition and function of the Soviet judiciary, the distinctive features of Soviet legal protection, and his arguments for the continued necessity of the death penalty in the Soviet Union. Pashukanis’s transcribed speech and interventions in Copenhagen are contextualised against the background of his changing conception of law in the aftermath of forced collectivisation and his contemporaneous feud with Pyotr Stuchka. The aim of this contextualisation is to correct for one-sided treatments of Pashukanis’s concept of legal form that seek to artificially divorce the revolutionary legal theorist from the seasoned legal practitioner who represented the Soviet Union on the international stage. The article is accompanied by the first-ever English translation of Pashukanis’s newly discovered speech and a selection of his documented conference interventions.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W7167708184

DOI

10.18261/ret.48.4.1

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.18261/ret.48.4.1

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.