UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Human-elephant conflict in Assam: A critical appraisal of the wildlife (Protection) act, 1972 and its judicial interpretation

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.22271/2790-0673.2026.v6.i8a.364

Auteurs

Shahnaj Sultana · Kuntala Roychoudhury

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:14:00.911720+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:14:00.911720+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

The Assam Royal Global University

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

The persistent and escalating Human-Elephant Conflict (HEC) in Assam poses a significant challenge to wildlife conservation, forest governance, and rural livelihoods. This research paper critically examines the legal and judicial responses to HEC in Assam, with a special focus on the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 (WPA), and its interpretative jurisprudence. The state of Assam, being a critical habitat for the endangered Asian elephant, has witnessed increasing incidents of crop depredation, property destruction, and human casualties, primarily due to habitat fragmentation, deforestation, linear infrastructure development, and encroachment on elephant corridors. Despite the legal protection accorded to elephants as a Schedule I species under the WPA, the enforcement framework appears inadequate to address the complex socio-ecological dimensions of this conflict. This paper evaluates the statutory provisions of the WPA in relation to elephant conservation and analyzes landmark judicial decisions that have attempted to reconcile environmental protection with human rights and development needs. It explores the evolving jurisprudence surrounding Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which includes both the right to life of humans and the right to a dignified existence for wildlife. The study further assesses the efficacy of policy measures, including compensation schemes, translocation efforts, and the use of technology in mitigating HEC. Employing a doctrinal methodology, the paper identifies legislative gaps, administrative inertia, and lack of community participation as key impediments to resolving HEC in Assam. It advocates for a rights-based, ecosystem-centric approach grounded in participatory conservation and legal reform. The findings underscore the urgent need for a harmonized legal strategy that integrates ecological science, traditional knowledge, and judicial foresight to ensure coexistence between humans and elephants. The paper concludes with recommendations aimed at strengthening the legal framework and promoting sustainable human-elephant coexistence in Assam.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7210263867

DOI

10.22271/2790-0673.2026.v6.i8a.364

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Forêt · Écosystème · Espèce

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.22271/2790-0673.2026.v6.i8a.364
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7210263867

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.