UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Indigenous biocultural rights and the Blue Mountains: Local and international policy challenges

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.1111/1745-5871.12610

Auteurs

Elodie Aime · Daniel Robinson

Année déclarée

2023

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:19:12.766491+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:19:12.766491+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

UNSW Sydney · University College Dublin

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Abstract Indigenous knowledges play a critical role in addressing the environmental crisis, and the United Nations system has adopted a suite of international treaties to protect and strengthen Indigenous peoples’ rights, which are often described as biocultural rights. Because World Heritage Areas are nominated and monitored by UNESCO, an initial hypothesis in this study was that such areas would be subject to higher than normal standards in regard to Indigenous people’s biocultural rights. By reference to the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area, Australia, this research examined how the international legislative framework influences conservation practices. We held semi‐structured interviews with conservation and Indigenous local experts and compared park management practices in the Area against those used in an Indigenous Protected Area. Findings align with the literature and suggest that Indigenous and scientific knowledge systems can generate new insights for the Area and other sites. Yet, Indigenous knowledges are only marginally applied in practice. Some barriers to full participation of Indigenous people are specific to the colonial history of the area. Yet, findings point to a lack of action by Australian governments and UNESCO, and that needs to be redressed. The study calls attention to the need to support and resource Indigenous people to enable collaborative partnerships to yield significant benefits for biodiversity and protection of Country.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W4380991250

DOI

10.1111/1745-5871.12610

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Montagne

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12610
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4380991250

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1488679353 · CITES
• Legal Geography: An A ustralian Perspective · CITES
• openalex:w1586549860 · CITES
• openalex:w1598054737 · CITES
• openalex:w1987350526 · CITES
• openalex:w2043934034 · CITES
• openalex:w2087910329 · CITES
• openalex:w2095682206 · CITES
• openalex:w2127749542 · CITES
• openalex:w2140304891 · CITES
• openalex:w2186146349 · CITES
• openalex:w2226396244 · CITES
• openalex:w2261745736 · CITES
• openalex:w2320238040 · CITES
• openalex:w246590289 · CITES
• openalex:w2498198435 · CITES
• openalex:w2552533637 · CITES
• openalex:w2589456099 · CITES
• openalex:w2782917446 · CITES
• openalex:w2793165177 · CITES

1 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.