DIREITOS FUNDAMENTAIS E PRINCÍPIOS CONSTITUCIONAIS: ANÁLISE SOBRE CONFLITOS, PONDERAÇÃO, LIMITES
Identification
- Clé publique
- radar:r-d6a73381e492b432c53df28a04534ddd
- Auteurs
- Cintya Nishimura Durães
- Année déclarée
- 2026
- Langue déclarée
- en
- Type source
- article
- Première détection
- 2026-11-13T12:44:23.251056+00:00
- Dernière observation des métadonnées
- 2026-11-13T12:44:23.251056+00:00
- Dernière vérification HTTP
- Non effectuée
Institutions déclarées par la source
Universidade de Marília
Pays d’affiliation déclarés
BR
Résumé documentaire — langue originale
The research addresses the conflict between fundamental rights and constitutional principles, as well as the balancing of rights and its limits within the Brazilian legal system. It aims to investigate how conflicts between fundamental rights involving constitutional principles are solved. The relationship between the right to housing and the right to a balanced environment is analyzed, considering that both are interconnected by the principle of human dignity and are essential for its realization. The application of balancing and its limits for judicial decisions are evaluated, observing some concrete cases under consideration with differing outcomes. The study seeks to understand the problem through the analysis of public policies and the State's actions in response to social demands related to housing. The deductive method is adopted, based on bibliographic and jurisprudential review. The importance of this research is highlighted due to the theme involving the conflict of rights and constitutional principles directly linked to human dignity, especially in relation to a balanced environment. It is concluded that conflict between rights and principles is inevitable, but that failures by public authorities to meet social demands, with the consequent regularization of environmental areas, interfere harmfully with the environment, thus disrespecting the principle of human dignity.
Identifiants
- OPENALEX
- https://openalex.org/W7167213032
- DOI
- 10.36598/dhrd.v9.3076
Repères documentaires
- Famille documentaire
- article
- Types déclarés par les sources
- article
Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.
Sources
OpenAlex · Document 1
Citer cette référence
Cintya Nishimura Durães. DIREITOS FUNDAMENTAIS E PRINCÍPIOS CONSTITUCIONAIS: ANÁLISE SOBRE CONFLITOS, PONDERAÇÃO, LIMITES. 2026. https://doi.org/10.36598/dhrd.v9.3076
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690 : formats bibliographiques fondés sur les champs disponibles. OSCOLA / Bluebook : données structurées uniquement ; aucune conformité juridique complète n’est revendiquée sans vérification des éléments nécessaires.
- APA
- Cintya Nishimura Durães. (2026). DIREITOS FUNDAMENTAIS E PRINCÍPIOS CONSTITUCIONAIS: ANÁLISE SOBRE CONFLITOS, PONDERAÇÃO, LIMITES. https://doi.org/10.36598/dhrd.v9.3076
- Chicago
- Cintya Nishimura Durães. DIREITOS FUNDAMENTAIS E PRINCÍPIOS CONSTITUCIONAIS: ANÁLISE SOBRE CONFLITOS, PONDERAÇÃO, LIMITES. 2026. https://doi.org/10.36598/dhrd.v9.3076
- ISO 690
- Cintya Nishimura Durães. DIREITOS FUNDAMENTAIS E PRINCÍPIOS CONSTITUCIONAIS: ANÁLISE SOBRE CONFLITOS, PONDERAÇÃO, LIMITES. 2026. https://doi.org/10.36598/dhrd.v9.3076
Warning: Undefined array key "last_link_verified" in /home/clients/e27d81e12f04d2bfd747aa264540ac56/sites/_UDTR_APP/legal_library_reference.php on line 31
UDTR — Bibliothèque juridique mondiale des droits de la Nature. DIREITOS FUNDAMENTAIS E PRINCÍPIOS CONSTITUCIONAIS: ANÁLISE SOBRE CONFLITOS, PONDERAÇÃO, LIMITES. Notice documentaire: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-d6a73381e492b432c53df28a04534ddd/ · Dernière vérification HTTP : non effectuée
Données de cette version figée
Dossiers et relations documentaires
Rôles des sources
Source bibliographique / publication d’origine · https://doi.org/10.36598/dhrd.v9.3076
Un lien vers une autorité ne prouve pas à lui seul une affirmation juridique. Les résumés et les textes intégraux restent soumis aux conditions de leur source.
Statut documentaire
Pertinence à examiner
Bibliothèque
Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.