UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Self-governing systems

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.3389/fpos.2025.1646734

Auteurs

Jeremy V. Pitt · Asimina Mertzani · Josiah Ober

Année déclarée

2025

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:10:39.027582+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:10:39.027582+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Imperial College London · Stanford University

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

A key driver in the digital transformation of commercial, educational, organizational and social systems is the increasing footprint of Artificial Intelligence (AI). This is producing a different kind of hybrid socio-technical system, which consists of interacting human and artificial “components.” However, beyond the realization of basic Agentic AI, AI components are likely to be taking over more advisory, supervisory and administrative roles, especially with respect to human components, and potentially without oversight from some external authority. This is a fundamentally different kind of self-governance—i.e., both operational and constitutional decisions concerning the selection, modification, application and enforcement of social arrangements—as a co-production of meaningful interaction between human and artificial intelligences. Using examples, this paper scopes out the identifying features of such self-governing systems, which raise several critical political questions about the kind of human rights that could reasonably be expected in such systems. This includes agency, voluntary association, empowerment, innovation and metrication, as they relate to this profound shift in our understanding of “human-computer interaction” and “human-machine teamwork.” Finally, given that self-governing social systems don't tend to persist if they can't adapt to a changing environment or resist entropic decay, we consider the idea of continuous self-improvement as a right in itself, from the perspectives of human factors and user experience, and what this implies for human flourishing and the right to human rights in this new techno-political ecology.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W4413381830

DOI

10.3389/fpos.2025.1646734

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1646734
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4413381830

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1508369527 · CITES
• openalex:w1535357018 · CITES
• openalex:w1596735325 · CITES
• openalex:w1984865333 · CITES
• openalex:w2003624562 · CITES
• openalex:w2023116690 · CITES
• openalex:w2046321047 · CITES
• openalex:w2137125422 · CITES
• openalex:w2169236932 · CITES
• openalex:w2201061873 · CITES
• openalex:w2251673724 · CITES
• openalex:w2296297756 · CITES
• openalex:w2333341495 · CITES
• openalex:w2472097883 · CITES
• openalex:w2494693899 · CITES
• openalex:w2594475271 · CITES
• openalex:w2761206392 · CITES
• openalex:w2783539613 · CITES
• openalex:w2784198807 · CITES
• openalex:w2808502873 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Publication académique détectée

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.