UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Constitutional Foundations of Corporate Social Responsibility: Comparative Analysis of India and Brazil

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.21684/2412-2343-2025-12-3-120-150

Auteurs

A. Aneja · Gagandeep Kaur

Année déclarée

2025

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.809917+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:04:47.809917+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

University of Delhi

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

IN

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Let us imagine a mix of corporate responsibility with constitutional values in order to bring up change in society. The paper is about how Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) affects social and environmental welfare, especially given the mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility of India and the voluntary, Constitution-based Corporate Social Responsibility of Brazil. The Indian model as prescribed by statutory provisions of the Companies Act of 2013 provided for company contributions to public good in education, health, and rural development above all under institutionalized CSR compliance with constitutional provisions of social justice in absolute deviation to the looser CSR framework in Brazil farfetched from the 1988 Constitution, which emphasizes rather corporate freedommore of a labor right, biodiversity, social inclusion without any stringent regulatory mandates. The comparative analysis lies in both strengths and challenges for each of the two models structured compliance to the innovative but still overly illustrative engagement of Brazil in this case. Real-case studies like Tata Group and Vedanta Resources in India and Petrobras and Natura & Co in Brazil show how practices of CSR imply within these countries. The article describes the concept of constitutionalism for sustainable development and in further terms carries on reforms towards more effective outcome-based CSR in keeping with national priorities to build up inclusive growth and ecosystem-friendly development. The comparative leg between corporate social responsibility and duty of obligation in the Constitution creates an advancement towards a far more equitable and sustainable future.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W4415460297

DOI

10.21684/2412-2343-2025-12-3-120-150

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

BR · IN

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Écosystème

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2025-12-3-120-150
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4415460297

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.