UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

WILDLIFE HEALTH AND THE NORTH AMERICAN MODEL OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.1638/2021-0114

Auteurs

Robin W. Radcliffe · David A. Jessup

Année déclarée

2022

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.733855+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:04:47.733855+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Cornell University · New York State College of Veterinary Medicine · University of California, Davis

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

US

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

The management of wildlife in the United States and Canada, including the monitoring and maintenance of the health of wildlife populations and the ecosystems on which they depend, are conducted under a set of principles that aim for sustainable use. This set of principles is known as the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation (the Model), and it guides wildlife management and conservation decisions in both countries. The purpose of this perspective is to highlight how wildlife health is an important part of the Model and is vital to its future. It is proposed that wildlife health and the Model support one another. First, the history and fundamental ideas of a public trust that shaped the Model are reviewed. Next, wildlife health is defined and examples are offered that highlight how the Model supports wildlife health and how health affects the Model, as well as the limitations or threats if one moves away from the Model's defining principles. Finally, controversies surrounding the Model are reviewed and a perspective on the future is offered, based in large part on the work of Aldo Leopold. Leopold's thinking about health of the land and its organisms was well ahead of its time, and the scientific underpinnings of his writings in making the case for wildlife health and the Model are recounted. As a simple addendum to Leopold's land ethic, a plea for a health ethic is called for, whereby healthy wildlife and healthy landscapes are an obligation of the Model and modern society because health “tends to preserve the integrity, stability and beauty of the biotic community.”41

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W4298006243

DOI

10.1638/2021-0114

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Écosystème · Paysage

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.1638/2021-0114
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4298006243

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1488566057 · CITES
• openalex:w1492043245 · CITES
• openalex:w1514769873 · CITES
• The Public Trust Doctrine in Environmental and Natural Resources Law · CITES
• openalex:w1551884531 · CITES
• openalex:w1919335466 · CITES
• openalex:w1969961692 · CITES
• openalex:w1983217046 · CITES
• openalex:w1993794001 · CITES
• openalex:w2009396551 · CITES
• openalex:w2027524629 · CITES
• openalex:w2044016734 · CITES
• openalex:w2044325671 · CITES
• openalex:w2059127115 · CITES
• openalex:w2062989953 · CITES
• openalex:w2064805654 · CITES
• openalex:w2079993297 · CITES
• openalex:w2094177264 · CITES
• openalex:w2094385356 · CITES
• openalex:w2102338654 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.