UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

The influence of common property rights on forest management policy: a case study in Sardinia region, Italy

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.2478/v10132-012-0002-8

Auteurs

Alessandro Paletto · Isabella DE MEO · Fabrizio Ferretti

Année déclarée

2012

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:11:32.549903+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:11:32.549903+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Abstract The property rights and the type of ownership (private owners, public domain and commons) are two fundamental concepts in relationship to the local development and to the social and environmental sustainability. Common forests were established in Europe since the Middle Ages, but over the centuries the importance of commons changed in parallel with economic and social changes. In recent decades, the scientific debate focused on the forest management efficiency and sustainability of this type of ownership in comparison to the public and private property. In Italy common forests have a long tradition with substantial differences in the result of historical evolution in various regions. In Sardinia region the private forests are 377.297 ha, the public forests are 201.324 ha, while around 120.000 ha are commons. The respect of the common rights changed in the different historical periods. Today, the common lands are managed directly by municipalities or indirectly through third parties, in both cases the involvement of members of community is very low. The main objective of the paper is to analyse forest management differences in public institutions with and without common property rights. To achieve the objective of the research the forest management preferences of community members and managers were evaluated and compared. The analysis was realized through the use of the principal-agent model and it has been tested in a case study in Sardinia region (Arci-Grighine district). The analysis of the results showed that the categories of actors considered (members of community, municipalities and managers) have a marked productive profile, but municipalities manage forests perceiving a moderate multifunctionality. Moreover, the representatives of the municipalities pay more attention to the interests of the collectivity in comparison to the external managers. They also attribute high importance to environmental and social forest functions.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W2082267488

DOI

10.2478/v10132-012-0002-8

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

IT

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Forêt

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.2478/v10132-012-0002-8
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W2082267488

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1509535026 · CITES
• openalex:w1518863864 · CITES
• openalex:w1958602590 · CITES
• openalex:w2004096442 · CITES
• openalex:w2004409126 · CITES
• openalex:w2012809966 · CITES
• openalex:w2059537585 · CITES
• openalex:w2085876435 · CITES
• openalex:w2091861468 · CITES
• openalex:w2118549945 · CITES
• openalex:w2146826537 · CITES
• Common property rights, adaptive capacity, and response to forest disturbance · CITES
• openalex:w2162408557 · CITES
• openalex:w2164206328 · CITES
• openalex:w2226396244 · CITES
• openalex:w228029934 · CITES
• openalex:w2753514269 · CITES
• openalex:w4298037036 · CITES
• openalex:w7018164006 · CITES
• openalex:w7025177302 · CITES

2 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.