UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Designation of Land for Expropriation and Compensation for Property Rights in the Construction of the Semarang-Demak Toll Road

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.15294/lrrq.v12i4.47315

Auteurs

Syaiful Ihsan Hilmi

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.803602+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:04:47.803602+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

State University of Semarang

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

ID

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

This study aims to analyze the parameters for designating land as expropriated and the mechanisms for providing compensation for community property rights in the construction of the Semarang-Demak Toll Road. The main issue arises when land that still holds economic value for residents is designated as expropriated, resulting in compensation shifting from conventional compensation to a Goodwill Fund, which is considered to offer insufficient legal certainty. The research method employed is a legal-empirical approach using a case study methodology. Primary data was collected through field interviews, while secondary data includes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials analyzed using descriptive qualitative methods. The findings indicate that the designation of land as “expropriated” is based on cumulative parameters: changes in physical form, the loss of land boundaries, and the total loss of the land’s economic function. The regulatory transformation from Presidential Regulation No. 52 of 2022 to Presidential Regulation No. 27 of 2023 marks a significant paradigm shift, wherein the assessment of the Compensatory Fund is now professionally conducted by the Public Appraisal Services Office (KJPP) using the income capitalization method. Although land rights are legally and formally extinguished under the UUPA, the provision of the Redress Fund continues to be implemented as a social policy instrument reflecting the principle of distributive justice for affected groups. In conclusion, the effectiveness of this policy requires inter-agency collaboration through an Integrated Team as well as a more comprehensive legal reformulation to ensure that the protection of citizens’ economic rights remains safeguarded within National Strategic Projects.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7160186886

DOI

10.15294/lrrq.v12i4.47315

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v12i4.47315
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7160186886

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w4318988312 · CITES
• openalex:w4402783462 · CITES
• openalex:w4409855148 · CITES
• openalex:w4414450907 · CITES
• openalex:w4414847241 · CITES
• openalex:w4416346519 · CITES
• openalex:w4417518508 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.