Five notions of Haq: exploring vernacular rights cultures in Southern Asia
Identification
- Clé publique
- openalex:w1551119459
- Auteurs
- Sumi Madhok
- Année déclarée
- 2009
- Langue déclarée
- en
- Type source
- book
- Première détection
- 2026-11-09T19:18:55.795472+00:00
- Dernière observation des métadonnées
- 2026-11-09T19:18:55.795472+00:00
- Dernière vérification HTTP
- Non effectuée
Institutions déclarées par la source
London School of Economics and Political Science
Résumé documentaire — langue originale
Five Notions of Haq: Exploring Vernacular Rights Cultures in Southern Asia1 As India and Pakistan mark sixty years as postcolonial nations, an impressive feature of their uneven experiments with democracy is the confident and fluent employment of the language of rights to claim entitlements due to persons or groups from the State. While the lofty ideals of democracy, rights and citizenship have received intellectual support from South Asia's elite, it is their poor, marginalized and dispossessed whose everyday struggles for rights that have protected and animated them. The dynamism of this grassroots activism, which articulates rights for multiple groups, identities and practices and citizenship claims for governance reform needs empirical investigation and a theoretical and historical elaboration. Despite the meteoric rise of social mobilisations in South Asia and in India in particular, there are no studies which have examined the language within which demands and entitlements are articulated or the philosophical assumptions underpinning the use of rights language in the region. And finally, there has been little attempt to pursue a comparative and integrative study of theoretical and empirical exercise of rights across the Southern Asian region. This working paper is a preliminary effort to document the various contemporary rights meanings in South Asia. It focuses on the etymological and vernacular history of the literal term used to denote a right in Southern Asia, which is the Arabic/Urdu literal term 'Haq'. In order to map contemporary meanings of Haq or rights in India and Pakistan, I put forward and examine five different justificatory premises upon which Haq is popularly predicted. By attending to the justificatory premises underpinning rights meanings, I investigate the ways in which rights are grounded in specific empirical contexts; address conceptual and empirical histories, political practices and contemporary politics of human rights in Southern Asia and think about political practices and political cultures outside the western world in a manner that avoids standard misdescriptions and misrepresentations of these. More specifically, through this paper, I wish to think about the relationship between our conceptual vocabularies and our moral lives and in doing so, examine the ways in which language reinforces and contributes to the construction of social hierarchies based upon asymmetrical relationships of power, exclusion, status and privilege. Thus, it is not only important to investigate the originary histories of the words but also to identify the sociological and political relationships that these words signify/uphold and are implicated in. And finally, in identifying the different justificatory premises of Haq, I hope to provide not only descriptions of citizenship articulations in non-western contexts but also conceptual articulations of its core referent: rights. A note of caution however, must be inserted here. Any research of this kind that aims to traverse cross cultural intellectual terrains is always in danger of falling prey to several kinds of intellectual danger. In respect of this particular research, there are at least four types of intellectual dangers: we need to be wary of not only orientalist representations of the non-western political subject, but also equally wary of reverse orientalism or occidentalism2, of crude indigenisms or dangerous neo-nativisms which pay inadequate attention to the multiple sources which feed into the making of conceptual histories and of thinking about rights and citizenship as evolutionary and necessarily progressive by attending to the exclusions and 'othering' which takes place both through discourse and practice. In this paper, I shall first identify and outline the important questions central to the study of vernacular rights cultures. I proceed to provide a brief etymological and intellectual description of Haq which is the principal literal term within Urdu/Arabic to denote a right in Northern India and Pakistan. …
Identifiants
- OPENALEX
- W1551119459
Repères documentaires
- Famille documentaire
- Livre
- Types déclarés par les sources
- book
Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.
Description bibliographique du livre
Disponibilité non établie
Sources
OpenAlex · Document 1
Relations bibliographiques documentées
Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.
- openalex:w1481473299 · CITES
- openalex:w1493700376 · CITES
- openalex:w1507011297 · CITES
- openalex:w1526945924 · CITES
- openalex:w1981553963 · CITES
- openalex:w1986591222 · CITES
- openalex:w199283030 · CITES
- openalex:w2012676519 · CITES
- openalex:w2018766480 · CITES
- openalex:w2020056362 · CITES
- openalex:w2026133433 · CITES
- openalex:w2079315529 · CITES
- openalex:w2084692155 · CITES
- openalex:w2093833615 · CITES
- openalex:w2101760715 · CITES
- openalex:w2120904102 · CITES
- openalex:w2128647230 · CITES
- openalex:w2152578075 · CITES
- openalex:w2161006057 · CITES
- openalex:w2165842845 · CITES
0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté
Provenance des champs documentaires
Les valeurs étayées et les valeurs de provenance non résolue sont séparées. Une provenance bibliographique ne valide aucune affirmation juridique.
- Titre
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Publication
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Auteurs
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Type documentaire
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Juridiction
- Non renseigné
- Cour
- Non renseigné
- Autorité émettrice
- Non renseigné
- Éditeur
- Non renseigné
- DOI
- Non renseigné
- ISBN
- Non renseigné
- Identifiant officiel
- Non renseigné
- URL source
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Statut déclaré par la source
- Non renseigné
- Modification / abrogation
- Non renseigné
Citer cette référence
Sumi Madhok. Five notions of Haq: exploring vernacular rights cultures in Southern Asia. 2009. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-c4c0d25dc4650fb1fcd29e50f14409fb/
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690 : formats bibliographiques fondés sur les champs disponibles. OSCOLA / Bluebook : données structurées uniquement ; aucune conformité juridique complète n’est revendiquée sans vérification des éléments nécessaires.
- APA
- Sumi Madhok. (2009). Five notions of Haq: exploring vernacular rights cultures in Southern Asia. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-c4c0d25dc4650fb1fcd29e50f14409fb/
- Chicago
- Sumi Madhok. Five notions of Haq: exploring vernacular rights cultures in Southern Asia. 2009. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-c4c0d25dc4650fb1fcd29e50f14409fb/
- ISO 690
- Sumi Madhok. Five notions of Haq: exploring vernacular rights cultures in Southern Asia. 2009. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-c4c0d25dc4650fb1fcd29e50f14409fb/
UDTR — Bibliothèque juridique mondiale des droits de la Nature. Five notions of Haq: exploring vernacular rights cultures in Southern Asia. Notice documentaire: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-c4c0d25dc4650fb1fcd29e50f14409fb/ · Dernière vérification HTTP : non effectuée
Provenance par champ et version de la notice
Version 24847a3b85efbd4d · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Titre
- OpenAlex · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.795472+00:00
- Auteurs
- OpenAlex · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.795472+00:00
- Année
- OpenAlex · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.795472+00:00
- Identifiants
- OpenAlex · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.795472+00:00
- ORCID déclarés des auteurs
- OpenAlex · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.795472+00:00
L’historique porte sur les métadonnées de la notice, sans certifier l’état du droit.
b144947eca15f7f1 · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.795472+00:00
8157e5a0228a8a3b · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.795472+00:00
738da24fb710efc3 · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.795472+00:00
24847a3b85efbd4d · 2026-11-09T19:18:55.795472+00:00
Données de cette version figée
Dossiers et relations documentaires
London School of Economics and Political Science
Rôles des sources
Source de découverte · https://openalex.org/W1551119459
Un lien vers une autorité ne prouve pas à lui seul une affirmation juridique. Les résumés et les textes intégraux restent soumis aux conditions de leur source.
Statut documentaire
Publication académique détectée
Bibliothèque
Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.