UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Fiduciary Internationalism: Reimagining the Trusteeship Council as a Representative Organ for the Voiceless

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.58733/imhfd.1932172

Auteurs

Abdulkadir Nacar

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

tr

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.729888+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:04:47.729888+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Atatürk University

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

TR

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

The Trusteeship Council, originally established under Chapter XIII of the UN Charter to supervise trust territories and guide them toward self-government or independence, has become largely dormant since the completion of decolonization. This article argues that the Council, rather than being treated as a historical relic, can be reconceptualized as a functional institutional mechanism to address persistent representation gaps in international adjudication. By drawing on the Roman law concept of mandatum and situating the proposal within broader doctrinal debates on actio popularis and locus standi, the study explores how the Trusteeship Council could serve as a neutral representative body for non-state actors, including stateless peoples, climate-displaced populations, and multinational corporations.The article analyses the fundamental structural limitations within the existing international legal framework, especially the traditional state-centric approach to locus standi before international courts and tribunals, including the ICJ and proposes an institutional solution that preserves the Charter framework while enhancing procedural access to justice. Through doctrinal analysis of the UN Charter, relevant jurisprudence, and institutional practice, the article demonstrates that repurposing the Trusteeship Council could bridge the divide between the formal recognition of rights and their effective real-world enforcement. Ultimately, this article proposes a pragmatic reform that strengthens the inclusiveness of international law without requiring radical institutional overhaul.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7221508871

DOI

10.58733/imhfd.1932172

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Territoire

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.58733/imhfd.1932172
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7221508871

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1502675713 · CITES
• openalex:w1587294828 · CITES
• openalex:w1591824486 · CITES
• openalex:w1603558427 · CITES
• openalex:w184048257 · CITES
• openalex:w1974077382 · CITES
• openalex:w1980685203 · CITES
• openalex:w1989785158 · CITES
• openalex:w2047237130 · CITES
• openalex:w2061593266 · CITES
• openalex:w2062719916 · CITES
• openalex:w2115884402 · CITES
• openalex:w2131740028 · CITES
• openalex:w2146215071 · CITES
• openalex:w2159381544 · CITES
• openalex:w2364961045 · CITES
• openalex:w2484023255 · CITES
• openalex:w2487921602 · CITES
• openalex:w2492797061 · CITES
• openalex:w2493120921 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.