UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

The Ecology of Justice: Reconstructing Environmental Law for the Anthropocene

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.5281/zenodo.20785426

Auteurs

Happy Okundaye Oji, LLB, BL, LLM

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:11:05.426531+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:11:10.992403+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

The accelerating climate crisis, unprecedented biodiversity loss, ecosystem degradation, and increasing environmental vulnerability have exposed fundamental limitations within contemporary environmental law. Although environmental law has evolved significantly over the past half-century, much of its normative structure remains grounded in assumptions developed during an era in which ecological stability was largely taken for granted. Existing legal frameworks continue to prioritise regulatory control, resource management, and human-centred conceptions of environmental protection. While these approaches have contributed to important environmental achievements, they increasingly struggle to respond to the complex ecological realities of the Anthropocene. This article argues that the challenges of the Anthropocene require more than stronger environmental regulations or improved governance mechanisms. They require a fundamental reconstruction of environmental law itself. Central to this reconstruction is the concept of the Ecology of Justice, a jurisprudential framework that understands justice as emerging from the relationships that connect human societies, ecological systems, future generations, and the broader community of life. Rather than treating environmental protection as an extension of human interests, the Ecology of Justice recognises ecological integrity as a foundational condition of justice itself. Drawing upon climate justice scholarship, ecological jurisprudence, environmental ethics, Earth system governance, intergenerational justice theory, and contemporary developments in international environmental law, this article examines the inadequacy of anthropocentric legal frameworks in addressing planetary ecological crises. It develops an alternative normative approach grounded in ecological interdependence, relational responsibility, stewardship, and long-term environmental sustainability. The article contends that environmental law must evolve from a system primarily concerned with regulating environmental harm into one capable of sustaining the ecological relationships upon which collective wellbeing depends. Ultimately, the article argues that the future of environmental law lies not in managing environmental decline but in reimagining law itself as a mechanism for maintaining ecological justice in an era of planetary change. The Ecology of Justice provides a framework through which environmental law may become more responsive to the realities of the Anthropocene and more capable of securing a just and sustainable future for present and future generations. Keywords: Environmental Law, Ecology of Justice, Climate Justice, Anthropocene, Ecological Jurisprudence, Environmental Rights, Sustainability, Intergenerational Justice, Earth System Governance, Ecological Responsibility, Environmental Governance, Climate Change.

Identifiants

DOI

10.5281/zenodo.20785426

OPENAIRE

doi_dedup___::9a465048a1930c225a8941f819268b8d

OPENALEX

W7165479616

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

Article · article

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Écosystème

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAIRE · Document 1 · Document 2

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20785426
• Document · https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20785426
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7165479616

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.