UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Customary Council Decisions as Grounds for the Elimination of Prosecution: Notes on the Criminal Procedure Code

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-bb8b364db3a40523b2c88314ac007efd

Auteurs

Aris Hardinanto · Zico Junius Fernando · Nahdiya Sabrina · Eka Nugraha Putra · Benny Sumardiana

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-14T02:13:26.331167+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-14T02:13:26.331167+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Universitas Trunodjoyo Madura · University of Bengkulu · Universitas Merdeka Malang · National University of Singapore · NUS Centre for Trusted Internet and Community · State University of Semarang

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

ID · SG

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

This article examines whether decisions issued by customary councils should constitute a legal ground for the elimination of prosecution under Indonesia’s Law No. 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code. Following the enactment of Law No. 1 of 2023 on the National Criminal Code, customary criminal law has been formally recognized as part of Indonesian living law. However, the Criminal Procedure Code does not provide procedural provisions governing the relationship between customary justice mechanisms and the state criminal justice system. Using normative legal research with statutory and case approaches, this study analyzes Supreme Court jurisprudence recognizing customary decisions as a valid basis for eliminating prosecution. The findings indicate that the lack of procedural recognition creates legal uncertainty and undermines the principle of legal pluralism. Therefore, this article proposes the inclusion of a specific provision in the Criminal Procedure Code that recognizes customary council decisions as a ground for eliminating prosecution when the offender has complied with the imposed customary sanction.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W7216268900

DOI

10.15294/ijcls.v11i1.31803

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Éditeurs

Jurusan Ilmu Komputer Universitas Negeri Semarang

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijcls/article/view/31803

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.