Shared parenting in Australia? : Examining the involvement of men and women in childrearing
Identification
- Clé publique
- doi:10.25911/5d7639aacd552
- Auteurs
- Gray, Edith
- Année déclarée
- 2001
- Langue déclarée
- und · en_AU
- Type source
- Thesis (PhD)
- Première détection
- 2026-11-09T19:08:23.873581+00:00
- Dernière observation des métadonnées
- 2026-11-09T19:08:23.873581+00:00
- Dernière vérification HTTP
- Non effectuée
Résumé documentaire — langue originale
Studies published in the 1980s and 1990s on parenting note an increase in scholarship focusing on paternal involvement. Many of these studies centre on fathers alone, rather than on the intra-household division of labour between mothers and fathers. Further, the bulk of this research has been conducted in countries other than Australia. Few surveybased investigations have explored the factors associated with men's and women's childrearing behaviour. Data used to investigate the many components of parenting was from three main sources. Published national data from census and labour force surveys illustrate the major trends in fertility and with whom children live. This information is supplemented by the first wave of a national longitudinal survey, Negotiating the Lifecourse (NLC). These sources are further used to examine the involvement of parents in the paid labour force, and to compare the work situations of parents and non-parents. More detailed information on parents' situations was collected in a survey designed specifically for this study entitled the Parenting Survey 1999. The sample was drawn from NLC respondents, and obtains information on parental identity, childrearing tasks and parenting styles. A set of factors is associated with higher levels of parental involvement for men. These factors were found to be important in a number of analyses of parenting. Men who report higher levels of investment in parenting, whose partner is attached to the labour force, and age of the child are related to many childrearing measures. Further, men's ability to integrate other components of their lives (such as work and friends) is related to their use of authoritative parenting styles. For women factors such as attachment to the labour force, education and income are related to childrearing tasks, while women's labour force participation is related to their use of authoritative parenting styles. The relationship between work and childrearing is found to be a complicated one, with women's employment being associated with higher levels of involvement in childrearing for men and lower levels for women. However, women who work are more likely to use authoritative parenting styles, which have been linked to positive child development. It is suggested that the relationship between employment and childrearing be examined in greater detail. There are many questions that arise on the topics addressed in this research. These include the level of underreporting of fertility by men, the time spent in different household types by parents and whether younger cohorts are facing new families or no families. In order to address these questions it is necessary to use longitudinal data in analysing topics associated with parental and family research.
Identifiants
- DOI
- 10.25911/5d7639aacd552
- HANDLE
- 1885/10841
- OAI
- oai:openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au:1885/10841
Repères documentaires
- Famille documentaire
- Thèse
- Types déclarés par les sources
- Thesis (PhD)
- Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites
- AU
Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.
Sources
Repository · Document 1 · Document 2 · Document 3
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.25911/5d7639aacd552
- Handle · https://hdl.handle.net/1885/10841
- Document · https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstreams/3b49d719-8467-4e51-ae16-aab51f12e911/download
Provenance des champs documentaires
Les valeurs étayées et les valeurs de provenance non résolue sont séparées. Une provenance bibliographique ne valide aucune affirmation juridique.
- Titre
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Publication
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Auteurs
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Type documentaire
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Juridiction
- Sujet étudié dérivé du contexte documentaire explicite
- Cour
- Non renseigné
- Autorité émettrice
- Non renseigné
- Éditeur
- Non renseigné
- DOI
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- ISBN
- Non renseigné
- Identifiant officiel
- Non renseigné
- URL source
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Statut déclaré par la source
- Non renseigné
- Modification / abrogation
- Non renseigné
Citer cette référence
Gray, Edith. Shared parenting in Australia? : Examining the involvement of men and women in childrearing. 2001. https://doi.org/10.25911/5d7639aacd552
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690 : formats bibliographiques fondés sur les champs disponibles. OSCOLA / Bluebook : données structurées uniquement ; aucune conformité juridique complète n’est revendiquée sans vérification des éléments nécessaires.
- APA
- Gray, Edith. (2001). Shared parenting in Australia? : Examining the involvement of men and women in childrearing. https://doi.org/10.25911/5d7639aacd552
- Chicago
- Gray, Edith. Shared parenting in Australia? : Examining the involvement of men and women in childrearing. 2001. https://doi.org/10.25911/5d7639aacd552
- ISO 690
- Gray, Edith. Shared parenting in Australia? : Examining the involvement of men and women in childrearing. 2001. https://doi.org/10.25911/5d7639aacd552
UDTR — Bibliothèque juridique mondiale des droits de la Nature. Shared parenting in Australia? : Examining the involvement of men and women in childrearing. Notice documentaire: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-b9f85f5ef653142b96927f130175a736/ · Dernière vérification HTTP : non effectuée
Provenance par champ et version de la notice
Version 4495031c96be9df6 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Titre
- Repository_ANU · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:23.873581+00:00
- Auteurs
- Repository_ANU · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:23.873581+00:00
- Année
- Repository_ANU · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:23.873581+00:00
- Identifiants
- Repository_ANU · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:23.873581+00:00
- URL source
- Repository_ANU · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:23.873581+00:00
L’historique porte sur les métadonnées de la notice, sans certifier l’état du droit.
8950d96d0e7d2fb3 · 2026-11-09T19:08:23.873581+00:00
1e3c5f7f932469e6 · 2026-11-09T19:08:23.873581+00:00
8c1e6c589d38f0ce · 2026-11-09T19:08:23.873581+00:00
4495031c96be9df6 · 2026-11-09T19:08:23.873581+00:00
Données de cette version figée
Dossiers et relations documentaires
AU ·
Rôles des sources
Source bibliographique / publication d’origine · https://doi.org/10.25911/5d7639aacd552
Source bibliographique / publication d’origine · https://hdl.handle.net/1885/10841
Dépôt institutionnel bibliographique · https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstreams/3b49d719-8467-4e51-ae16-aab51f12e911/download
Un lien vers une autorité ne prouve pas à lui seul une affirmation juridique. Les résumés et les textes intégraux restent soumis aux conditions de leur source.
Statut documentaire
Pertinence à examiner
Bibliothèque
Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.