UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Reparación integral en daños contra la naturaleza en el Ecuador caso Bosque Protector los Cedros

Identification

Clé publique

openalex:w3164104856

Auteurs

Marcelo V. Barba

Année déclarée

2019

Langue déclarée

es

Type source

dissertation

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.679936+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:05:34.950666+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

In the present investigation the integral reparation in damages to the environment with respect to the knowledge of the cause N ° 10332-2018-00640 was analyzed, as controversy presented by the Autonomous Decentralized Government of the Canton Santa Ana de Cotacachi against the Ministry of Environment and Water, State Attorney General and National Mining Company of Ecuador in the Los Cedros Protective Forest. In the first chapter, bibliographic information is collected to theoretically support recognition as a subject of rights to nature in Ecuador, in the international and national context. In the second chapter the methodology was developed, which has a qualitative approach, where the description of the processes and events was considered through the analysis of documents, doctrine, jurisprudence, laws and case study: Protective Forest Los Cedros. And in the third chapter an analysis of the case was elaborated, where the arguments and motivations of the procedural parts are identified and the decision dictated by the Court of the Provincial Court of Justice to culminate with the conclusions of the study. Finally, although Ecuador since 2008 is a pioneer in the recognition of the Rights of Nature through the current Constitution, there are still legal gaps, omissions, ignorance by public and private institutions in the execution of public works, consisting of the exploration and exploitation of natural resources; consequently in practice, considered as an object to nature and not as a subject of rights.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W3164104856

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Thèse

Types déclarés par les sources

dissertation

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

EC

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Forêt

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• Document · http://repositorio.uotavalo.edu.ec/handle/52000/171
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W3164104856

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.