UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Greenprint for a Climate Justice Clinic: law schools' most significant access to justice challenge

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.19164/ijcle.v25i3.766

Auteurs

Adrian Evans

Année déclarée

2018

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:15:44.548263+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:15:44.548263+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Monash University

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Seeking climate justice is not straightforward. Larger private law firm engagement with climate defence is often conflicted out because the short-term profit interests of their large corporate clients often dominate the thinking of both lawyer and client. Even those few private lawyers who do want to take action are intimidated by the need for considerable funding for disbursements and likely defendant arguments about the supposed need for security for costs. So far, no one in Australia has been able to locate a wealthy benefactor, foundation or not-for-profit prepared to meet these costs.Some law schools are nevertheless in a position to fill this access to justice void and assist in the effort to combat climate change by designing and developing a climate defence or climate justice clinic. There are potential causes of action in the areas of nuisance, negligence and public trust, as well as specific statutory and general regulatory arguments that can be developed in some jurisdictions.This paper discusses and proposes a greenprint for such a clinic, not just to assist access to justice and climate defence, but to play a part in strengthening the political and social consciousness of the law students who pass through it. The discussion draws on the clinic design principles set out in Australian Clinical Legal Education and proposes a specific partnership model that leverages existing private lawyer goodwill and harnesses law school alumni beneficence.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W2904492738

DOI

10.19164/ijcle.v25i3.766

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.19164/ijcle.v25i3.766
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W2904492738

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w2801922131 · CITES
• openalex:w4213147624 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.