UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Stakeholder Values Inform Indigenous Peoples’ Governance and Management of a Former National Park in New Zealand

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.1007/s10745-020-00170-4

Auteurs

Corinne Y. Bataille · K. Luke · Tarnya Kruger · Sanna K. Malinen · Robert B. Allen · AMY L. WHITEHEAD · Phil O’B. Lyver

Année déclarée

2020

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.937312+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:17:55.233821+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research · National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research · University of Canterbury

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

NZ

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Abstract The global emphasis on stakeholder engagement in protected area management has increased over the last three decades. Here we present key values of statutory and non-statutory stakeholder groups as they relate to their relationship with the former Te Urewera National Park (NP), New Zealand, which is now recognised as “a legal entity” with “all the rights,powers, duties, and liabilities of a legal person.” Non-statutory stakeholders conveyed a close, personal connection to Te Urewera NP in terms of heritage and legacy, which include both consumptive (e.g., hunting; fishing) and non-consumptive use (e.g., sight-seeing, hiking, boating). In contrast, statutory stakeholders expressed a more distant and procedural relationship with the park. Both stakeholder groups perceived the possible transfer of ownership or governance of Te Urewera NP to Tūhoe (the Indigenous Māori peoples of the Te Urewera region) favourably and expressed a desire to be engaged in the future stewardship of the NP. Stakeholders considered the fostering of relations with Tūhoe and other stakeholder groups as important to nurturing and maintaining their links with the area in future. Importantly, common interests that emerge from these relationships can increase mutual understanding between cultures and willingness to collaborate. Moreover, we posit that the legal personhood status for protected areas will be a powerful tool for reconciling pluralistic values and enable deliberative processes and flexible modes of collaboration between Indigenous peoples and non-indigenous stakeholders.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W3083668447

DOI

10.1007/s10745-020-00170-4

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

NZ

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00170-4
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W3083668447

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects · CITES
• openalex:w1526354211 · CITES
• openalex:w1532410514 · CITES
• openalex:w1542356730 · CITES
• openalex:w1551533759 · CITES
• openalex:w1952216725 · CITES
• openalex:w1967631498 · CITES
• openalex:w1977553222 · CITES
• openalex:w1978675886 · CITES
• openalex:w1985363405 · CITES
• openalex:w1995815823 · CITES
• openalex:w1997102788 · CITES
• openalex:w2001393532 · CITES
• openalex:w2007955049 · CITES
• openalex:w2008296535 · CITES
• openalex:w2011518704 · CITES
• openalex:w2024205849 · CITES
• openalex:w2028148183 · CITES
• openalex:w2032562586 · CITES
• openalex:w2035927270 · CITES

6 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.