Securing tenure rights to communal forests in Masindi district, Uganda: Lessons from Participatory Prospective Analysis
Identification
- Clé publique
- doi:10.17528/cifor/006641
- Auteurs
- Baruani Mshale · C. Mukasa · Alice Tibazalika · E. Mwangi · Banana A.Y. · P. Wamala · G. Okiror
- Année déclarée
- 2017
- Langue déclarée
- en
- Type source
- book
- Première détection
- 2026-11-09T19:13:38.744309+00:00
- Dernière observation des métadonnées
- 2026-11-09T19:13:38.744309+00:00
- Dernière vérification HTTP
- Non effectuée
Institutions déclarées par la source
Center for International Forestry Research · Centre for International Forestry Research · Makerere University
Résumé documentaire — langue originale
Key messages The Participatory Prospective Analysis (PPA) process in Masindi district in Uganda's Western Region brought together stakeholders from government, the private sector, NGOs and local communities to collectively reflect on factors affecting local tenure rights, forecast future scenarios and propose actionable plans for securing forest tenure rights. Participants identified several factors threatening local forest tenure rights. These included: lack of land ownership documentation; inadequate implementation and enforcement of forest policies, laws and programs; land use changes; gender bias against women; political interference; lack of community awareness of forest tenure rights; and inadequate financial and human resources to effectively protect local people's rights to forests and land. To identify potential barriers and drivers, three workshops were organized. With both forestry and agricultural sectors being male-dominated, one women-only workshop was organized to capture women's perspectives and compare findings with those of the mixed gender group. The two groups identified four key "driving forces" impacting forest tenure security: (1) community participation in forest tenure reform implementation, particularly that of women; (2) access to financial resources to implement forest tenure reform activities; (3) the importance of outside organizations having an awareness of community, cultural and institutional norms and beliefs regarding forest tenure rights; (4) the role played by local and national government agencies and politicians in coordinating and promoting progress towards forest tenure reforms. Women stakeholders emphasized the importance of access to land for forestry activities as critical to securing their rights; they also noted that supportive men and domestic relationships can impact on women's rights to forest land. Mixed group stakeholders identified the role of oil, gas and other industrial activities as a key threat to local forest tenure security. Participants developed four scenarios to anticipate potential future situations impacting on local forest tenure rights. Desirable scenarios depicted a well-governed, well-financed forestry sector characterized by gender equality and participative forest management. Undesirable scenarios were characterized by a dominant oil and gas sector undermining forest sustainability and forest rights; a weak, underfunded and poorly-managed forest sector; forest conversion to other uses; government failure to recognize community rights and integrate communities in forest management; and disappointed, disempowered communities collectively destroying forests for survival instead of managing them sustainably. Several actions were identified to secure local forest tenure rights: 1) making district-level government more responsive to local needs and aspirations around community forest tenure reforms; 2) increasing the number of well-trained district government officers and providing adequate financial resources; 3) facilitating a faster and affordable process for community forest registration, including community incentives; 4) equipping communities with knowledge, skills and resources to enhance their participation in forest tenure reform implementation; 5) promoting environmentally and socially responsible investments to mobilize resources for protecting local people's forest tenure rights.
Identifiants
- OPENALEX
- W2769668770
- DOI
- 10.17528/cifor/006641
Repères documentaires
- Famille documentaire
- Livre
- Types déclarés par les sources
- book
- Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites
- UG
- Entités naturelles mentionnées
- Forêt
Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.
Description bibliographique du livre
Disponibilité non établie
Sources
OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2
Relations bibliographiques documentées
Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.
1 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté
Provenance des champs documentaires
Les valeurs étayées et les valeurs de provenance non résolue sont séparées. Une provenance bibliographique ne valide aucune affirmation juridique.
- Titre
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Publication
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Auteurs
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Type documentaire
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Juridiction
- Sujet étudié dérivé du contexte documentaire explicite
- Cour
- Non renseigné
- Autorité émettrice
- Non renseigné
- Éditeur
- Non renseigné
- DOI
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- ISBN
- Non renseigné
- Identifiant officiel
- Non renseigné
- URL source
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Statut déclaré par la source
- Non renseigné
- Modification / abrogation
- Non renseigné
Citer cette référence
Baruani Mshale; C. Mukasa; Alice Tibazalika; E. Mwangi; Banana A.Y.; P. Wamala; G. Okiror. Securing tenure rights to communal forests in Masindi district, Uganda: Lessons from Participatory Prospective Analysis. 2017. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006641
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690 : formats bibliographiques fondés sur les champs disponibles. OSCOLA / Bluebook : données structurées uniquement ; aucune conformité juridique complète n’est revendiquée sans vérification des éléments nécessaires.
- APA
- Baruani Mshale; C. Mukasa; Alice Tibazalika; E. Mwangi; Banana A.Y.; P. Wamala; G. Okiror. (2017). Securing tenure rights to communal forests in Masindi district, Uganda: Lessons from Participatory Prospective Analysis. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006641
- Chicago
- Baruani Mshale; C. Mukasa; Alice Tibazalika; E. Mwangi; Banana A.Y.; P. Wamala; G. Okiror. Securing tenure rights to communal forests in Masindi district, Uganda: Lessons from Participatory Prospective Analysis. 2017. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006641
- ISO 690
- Baruani Mshale; C. Mukasa; Alice Tibazalika; E. Mwangi; Banana A.Y.; P. Wamala; G. Okiror. Securing tenure rights to communal forests in Masindi district, Uganda: Lessons from Participatory Prospective Analysis. 2017. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006641
UDTR — Bibliothèque juridique mondiale des droits de la Nature. Securing tenure rights to communal forests in Masindi district, Uganda: Lessons from Participatory Prospective Analysis. Notice documentaire: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a7ca53f65fb2c135ce51842a59e8ed84/ · Dernière vérification HTTP : non effectuée
Provenance par champ et version de la notice
Version d1684582dbeb1e49 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Titre
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:38.744309+00:00
- Auteurs
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:38.744309+00:00
- Année
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:38.744309+00:00
- Identifiants
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:38.744309+00:00
- URL source
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:38.744309+00:00
- ORCID déclarés des auteurs
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:38.744309+00:00
L’historique porte sur les métadonnées de la notice, sans certifier l’état du droit.
bba9fc8b2bfb32d7 · 2026-11-09T19:13:38.744309+00:00
6468a0b156737ff5 · 2026-11-09T19:13:38.744309+00:00
4ea6250aba262377 · 2026-11-09T19:13:38.744309+00:00
d1684582dbeb1e49 · 2026-11-09T19:13:38.744309+00:00
Données de cette version figée
Dossiers et relations documentaires
UG ·
Center for International Forestry Research
Center for International Forestry Research
Centre for International Forestry Research
Rôles des sources
Source de découverte · https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006641
Source de découverte · https://openalex.org/W2769668770
Un lien vers une autorité ne prouve pas à lui seul une affirmation juridique. Les résumés et les textes intégraux restent soumis aux conditions de leur source.
Statut documentaire
Pertinence à examiner
Bibliothèque
Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.