UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Constitutional Algorithms: Navigating the Tension Between Constitutional Rights and the Common Good

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.14738/abr.1409.12185

Auteurs

Noor Farihah Mohd Noor

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:17:40.272110+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:17:40.272110+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Universiti Utara Malaysia

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

The traditional architecture of constitutional adjudication has been predominantly occupied with restraining governmental power. This singular focus, however, has cultivated a jurisprudential blind spot: the capacity of individuals and private actors to exercise their constitutional rights in ways that systematically negate the rights of others and subvert the public good. This paper contends that the constitutional order faces an internal threat when rights are wielded as instruments of domination, exclusion, and civic paralysis. To address this threat, we introduce the concept of constitutional algorithms structured, principled judicial heuristics that compel courts to evaluate the externalities of rights-exercise. These algorithms mandate a systematic inquiry into whether a particular assertion of liberty produces a net benefit to the constitutional order or whether it inflicts disproportionate harm on the rights of co-citizens and the constitutional stability and institutional integrity. Through a systematic operational framework comprising harm identification, reciprocal justification, and systemic impact assessment, we demonstrate how courts can act as meta-guardians of the constitutional order. The paper concludes that algorithmic adjudication is essential to ensure that the exercise of one right does not negate the rights of others or subvert the public good, thereby redefining constitutional justice for Public-oriented societies.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7212076131

DOI

10.14738/abr.1409.12185

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.1409.12185
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7212076131

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w109677913 · CITES
• openalex:w2027789562 · CITES
• openalex:w2765573548 · CITES
• openalex:w4226087138 · CITES
• openalex:w4387520449 · CITES
• openalex:w4406540012 · CITES
• Sustainable Development in Comparative Constitutional Design · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.