UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Účinnost různých koncentrací lambda-cyhalothrinu, alpha-cypermethrinu a tau-fluvalinatu na lýkožrouta smrkového Ips typographus (Linnaeus 1758) v závislosti na pohlaví

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-a486769f743828ee23d0b826231eb515

Auteurs

Marie Zahradníková · Jaroslav Dostál · Petr Zahradník · Jakub Špoula

Année déclarée

—

Langue déclarée

cs

Type source

journal-article

Première détection

2026-11-13T09:08:38.206945+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-13T09:08:38.206945+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

<jats:p xml:lang="en">The aim of the experiment was to compare the efficacy of the synthetic pyrethroids lambda-cyhalothrin, alpha-cypermethrin and tau-fluvalinate on the spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus L.), as well as to observe the response based on the sex of the spruce bark beetle. The beetles were captured using barrier pheromone traps (Ridex s. r. o.). For laboratory evaluation of sensitivity, the methodology for testing resistance of the pollen beetle Brassicogethes aeneus (Fabricius, 1775) to insecticides was used according to the recommendations of the Insecticide Resistance Action Committee. The sex of each individual was determined by dissection. After 24 hours of exposure to lambda-cyhalothrin, 0% of both males and females survived, with alpha-cypermethrin, 0% of males and 0.16% of females survived, and with tau-fluvalinate, 2.8% of males and 3.87% of females survived. Statistical analysis of the data (using the Kruskal-Wallis test) indicated that tau-fluvalinate is less effective than lambda-cyhalothrin and alpha-cypermethrin, and that the sensitivity of the spruce bark beetle does not depend on its sex. More females (on average 72%) than males (on average 28%) were attracted to the pheromone traps used.</jats:p>

Identifiants

DOI

10.59269/zlv/2025/1/754

ISSN

0322-9688 · 1805-9872

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

journal-article

Éditeurs

Forestry and Game Management Research Institute

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

Crossref · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.59269/zlv/2025/1/754

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.