UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Insurance Policies as Joint Property in Family Law: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and England

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-9d207f543d8174fd36e552028389040a

Auteurs

Muazzul Muazzul · Mhd. Ansor Lubis · Azmiati Zuliah · Muslim Harahap · Ildar Rustamovich Begishev

Année déclarée

2025

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-14T02:16:27.580525+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-14T02:16:27.580525+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Medan Area University · Universitas Dharmawangsa · Universitas Harapan Medan · Kazan Innovative University named after V. G. Timiryasov

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

ID · RU

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

The legal status of insurance policies as part of joint assets is an interesting study because there are no specific regulations related to this. This study aims to analyze the status of insurance policies by comparing laws in the field of family law between Indonesia and England. This study is a normative legal study with a conceptual, comparative, and legislative approach. In Indonesian law, loss insurance, although the premium is paid from joint assets, is not categorized as joint assets because its function is to replace losses. In contrast, life insurance can be considered joint or personal assets depending on the source of premium funds, the purpose of the insurance, and the applicable agreement. On the other hand, the English legal system, which is based on common law, assesses insurance policies in marriage based on precedents and factual considerations, such as the source of funds and the time of the claim, although it is not explicitly regulated in legislation. This comparison shows that although Indonesia and England have different legal systems—civil law and common law—both have similarities in the basic principles of assessing the legal status of insurance policies, namely a contextual approach and based on relevant legal facts.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W4414773752

DOI

10.30996/jhbbc.v8i2.131952

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Éditeurs

Universitas 17 Agustus 1945

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v8i2.131952

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.