UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Domestic Violence Victim Protection in Contested Divorce: Analysis of Surabaya Religious Court Decision Post PERMA No. 3/2017

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-9b0a495205bc59665827f6dc92e12dc5

Auteurs

Sahat Parlindungan Simarmata

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-13T12:48:20.642929+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-13T12:48:20.642929+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Pelita Harapan University

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

ID

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Objective: This study aims to analyze the forms of legal protection afforded to domestic violence (DV) victims in divorce lawsuits under Islamic law and Indonesian positive law, using a case study of Surabaya Religious Court Decision No. 3929/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Sby following the enactment of Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2017 on Guidelines for Adjudicating Cases Involving Women Facing the Law. Methods: Employing a normative juridical method with case, statutory, and conceptual approaches, this study qualitatively analyzes the legal reasoning of the judicial panel. Results: The findings show that the judicial panel exercised ex officio authority to grant iddah maintenance of IDR 1,500,000 and mut’ah of IDR 1,000,000, despite the absence of such claims in the petition, as the wife was not proven nusyuz and had reported domestic violence. The ruling integrates three layers of protection: substantive protection based on maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, procedural protection through PERMA and SEMA, and administrative protection through collaboration with the Surabaya City Government. The study’s novelty lies in proposing a three-layer protection framework and evaluating the proportionality of the maintenance awarded against the Surabaya Regional Minimum Wage. Conclusion: This study contributes to strengthening the paradigm of substantive justice and gender sensitivity in Religious Court decisions and underscores the urgency of revising the Compilation of Islamic Law to explicitly recognize DV as a ground for divorce.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W7203910678

DOI

10.59784/glosains.v7i4.818

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Éditeurs

Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Kuningan

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.59784/glosains.v7i4.818

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.