UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Insights from equitable governance assessments in conservation areas around the world

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-99c647eece955fb5f0193896447da226

Auteurs

Naira Dehmel · Kate Schreckenberg · Phil Franks · Nikoleta Jones · Francesca Booker · Cosmas Kombat Lambini · Ruth Pinto · María Alejandra Cely-Gómez · Ishmael Chaukura · Donald Chilengwe Chikumbi · Phanith Chou · Ioli Christopoulou · Retche P. Colegado · Juliana Vélez-Echeverri · Emelda Miyanda Hachoofwe · Kalyan Hou · Corinne Samantha Julie · Reuben Lendira · Rodgers Lubilo · Bertille Mayen · Joyce Nyaruai Mbataru · Teresa Morales · Nguyễn Viết Dũng · Vincent Oduka Oluoch · Jean‐Aimé Razafindra‐Paul · Natalie J. Robinson · Constance M. Schéré · Samwel Shaba · Medard Twinamatsiko

Année déclarée

2025

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

review

Première détection

2026-11-13T12:49:10.390624+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-13T12:49:10.390624+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

King's College London · International Institute for Environment and Development · University of Warwick · Copperbelt University · Royal University of Phnom Penh · Bukidnon State University · International Union for Conservation of Nature (United Kingdom) · Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · Mbarara University of Science and Technology

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

GB · KH · PH · UG · US · ZM

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Global policy commitments to ensure that protected and conserved areas (PCAs) are equitably governed have increased interest in empirically assessing and analyzing social equity. Although numerous assessments have been conducted in individual PCAs, there is limited empirical insight into equity as a multidimensional concept beyond the site level. We investigated the distributional, procedural, and recognitional equity challenges associated with the governance of PCAs and determined whether the identified challenges differed according to governance type and actor group. We conducted a meta-level analysis of equitable governance assessments conducted at 37 PCAs in 19 countries that form part of the new SAGE (Site-level Assessment of Governance and Equity) database. SAGE is a participatory tool for site-level actors to systematically discuss and assess equity dynamics at their PCAs. We found a large variation in assessment results across the sites. Mitigating the negative impacts of conservation on local communities was most often identified as the biggest challenge. In general, equity assessments tended to be slightly more positive for PCAs governed by and with Indigenous Peoples and local communities than those governed purely by government agencies. Evaluations of different actors often revealed substantial differences in opinion on specific governance issues. In particular, evaluations of PCA decision-makers tended to be more positive than those of PCA users. As an early-stage exploration of the growing SAGE database, our findings provide proof of concept that tools for assessing and improving PCA governance gain value from taking multidimensional approaches and need to consider different actors' views. Although the growing SAGE database holds potential for further insights on how equity is perceived across governance types, ecosystems, and geographical regions, the primary objective of SAGE needs to remain understanding and advancing equity at the site level.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W4412044687

DOI

10.1111/cobi.70101

PMID

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40616351

PMCID

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/12856824

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

unknown

Types déclarés par les sources

review

Éditeurs

Wiley

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70101

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.