UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

نظریه عمومی دیون در حقوق اسلام و مقایسه آن با حقوق غرب

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-92e6642a7f48748b4a4a237e780f1948

Auteurs

—

Année déclarée

—

Langue déclarée

fa · per

Type source

journal article

Première détection

2026-11-13T15:33:08.405470+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-13T15:33:08.405470+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Abstract Debt, unlike the western law, is considered as a quite independent concept from “obligation” in the Islamic law and is regarded essentially as a kind of intangible personal property which has the characteristics of ownership and is a species of Ein(thing). The conceptual application of this legal institution in the contract and tort law is more extensive than the "obligation" concept. Due to this institution, Nominated contracts such as sale, rent, loan, and guarantee contract which are regarded as promissory contracts in the western law which merely cause obligations, are often considered as possessory in the Islamic law with a different effects. Also in tort law, the relationship between the person suffering the loss and the person causing the loss is not mainly only a personal promissory relationship but injured person is the owner of the equivalent or the value of the property and is its creditor of the tortfeasor and he, as any owner, has full legal control over this property. Thus it, considering the vast application of the debt in various domains of civil law as well as the quite independent and distinguished nature of it from obligation institution, can be suggested a comprehensive theory named “the general theory of debts that is a regulated and coordinated set of legal principles, rules, and concepts including concept, essence, subject, sources, the provisos, effects of debt and causes of debt discharging and fulfilling. This study is an introduction to this theory and represents the necessity of suggesting such theory. It should be noted that this theory which is perfectly consistent with the concepts of Islamic law, is in conflict with the western theory of obligations.

Identifiants

DOI

10.22091/csiw.2017.862

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

journal article

Éditeurs

دانشگاه قم

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAIRE · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.22091/csiw.2017.862

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.