UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Agri-Food Systems and Constitutional Disputes in Latin America: Hegemony and Production of Rationality in Chile’s Constitutional Processes

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.12854/erde-2025-788

Auteurs

Alexander Panez Pinto · Fany Lobos-Castro · Ilka Roose

Année déclarée

2025

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:16:39.523883+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:16:39.523883+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development · Universidad de Playa Ancha de Ciencias de la Educación · University of Bío-Bío

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Since the late 1990s, various Latin American countries have held constitutional processes as mechanisms for channeling social conflicts, in which food systems and rural territories stood out as relevant topics. In Chile, the neoliberal agrarian policy of largely uncontrolled agricultural intensification that used to receive broad-based international praise is facing increasing criticism due to its negative impact on the stability of ecosystems and society. This growing dissatisfaction led food systems and agrarian policy to become a focal point of debate in the Chilean constitutional process starting in 2020. In this context, our research seeks to analyze the actors and positions taken on food systems and rural territories in this process, as well as their underlying power structures, which resulted in the constitutional proposal’s rejection in a plebiscite held in 2022. To this end, we review the Constitutional Convention debates and four political campaigns for the plebiscite. We assume that the reasons for the constitutional proposal’s rejection are not to be primarily found in the constitutional commission debate on agri-food systems. Rather, they are a consequence of communication strategies mobilizing values and meaning among many inhabitants of rural territories by targeting their identity. By connecting the theory of agri-food geographies and critical rural studies, we consider that these strategies relate to the emergence of new right-wing populisms opposed to political proposals seeking solutions to the current socio-ecological crisis.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7116800821

DOI

10.12854/erde-2025-788

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

CL

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Écosystème · Territoire

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2 · Document 3

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.12854/erde-2025-788
• Document · https://www.die-erde.org/index.php/die-erde/article/view/788
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7116800821

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1669715526 · CITES
• openalex:w2115473099 · CITES
• openalex:w2131862277 · CITES
• openalex:w2754160983 · CITES
• openalex:w2789287244 · CITES
• openalex:w2797375546 · CITES
• openalex:w3004509946 · CITES
• openalex:w3006828202 · CITES
• openalex:w3007846592 · CITES
• openalex:w3094570408 · CITES
• openalex:w3112736511 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.