UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Distributive Equity Through Structure: A Community-Scale Worked Example of Values Stickiness

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.5281/zenodo.19600614

Auteurs

John Stroh

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.751379+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:04:47.751379+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

A body of recent legal scholarship argues that digital platforms exercise a distinct form of power — ecosystem power — operating simultaneously through three roles: as gatekeepers to the platform, as legislators of the relationships within their ecosystems, and as contractual actors participating in the transactions they rule on. Adjacent work proposes distributive equity, the fair allocation of welfare across all ecosystem participants, as a candidate additional consideration for antitrust enforcement where those participants are not equally served by traditional competition-law analysis. This paper documents a single worked example: a community-scale platform (Village, operated by My Digital Sovereignty Limited, Aotearoa New Zealand) whose structural commitments are the enactment of a prior theoretical commitment — that the welfare pathology identified in the research programme is best understood as a values drift pathology, and that structural architecture is the mechanism by which a platform's declared values can be made sticky enough to resist that drift. The paper situates Village's structural commitments inside the Tractatus framework that generated them — a constitutional architecture grounded in Wittgenstein's sayable / unsayable distinction, Berlin's value pluralism, Ostrom's polycentric governance, Alexander's living-systems principles, and Te Ao Māori frameworks of indigenous data sovereignty — and argues that the overlap between Village's work and the legal-academic research programme on ecosystem power is at the values layer, not only at the structural layer. Both are responses to the same concern: that platform power, left to drift, will be exercised against the welfare of ecosystem participants whose welfare the market does not defend. Section 4 documents the platform's AI substrate as a Situated Language Layer bound by the same constitutional architecture it enables, grounded in the operator's published AI Governance for Communities article series. The author is a single-founder company director, not a legal scholar. The paper's contribution is documentary rather than theoretical: it offers the research programme one primary-source-rich case to assess, critique, extend, or reject. Available editions: English (canonical), Deutsch, Français, Nederlands, and te reo Māori. The Māori edition is machine-translated by DeepL and pending native-speaker review; the other four are primary and machine-translated respectively. Canonical HTML edition: https://agenticgovernance.digital/whitepapers/distributive-equity.html

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7154509426

DOI

10.5281/zenodo.19600614

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Écosystème

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19600614
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7154509426

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.