UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Putting the pieces together: Integration for forest landscape restoration implementation

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.1002/ldr.3448

Auteurs

Stéphanie Mansourian · John A. Parrotta · Poorna Balaji · Imogen Bellwood‐Howard · Suhas Bhasme · Richard Patrick Bixler · Agni Klintuni Boedhihartono · Rachel Carmenta · Theresa M. Jedd · Wil de Jong · Frank K. Lake · Agnieszka Ewa Latawiec · Melvin Lippe · Nitin D. Rai · Jeffrey A. Sayer · Kristina Van Dexter · Bhaskar Vira · I.J. Visseren-Hamakers · Carina A. Wyborn · Anastasia Yang

Année déclarée

2019

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:17:15.919465+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:17:15.919465+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment · George Mason University · Institute of Development Studies · International Union of Forest Research Organizations · Kyoto University · Luc Hoffmann Institute · Manipal Academy of Higher Education · Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro · Radboud University Nijmegen · The University of Texas at Austin · US Forest Service · University of Agriculture in Krakow · University of British Columbia · University of Cambridge · University of Edinburgh · University of Geneva · University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Abstract The concept of forest landscape restoration (FLR) is being widely adopted around the globe by governmental, non‐governmental agencies, and the private sector, all of whom see FLR as an approach that contributes to multiple global sustainability goals. Originally, FLR was designed with a clearly integrative dimension across sectors, stakeholders, space and time, and in particular across the natural and social sciences. Yet, in practice, this integration remains a challenge in many FLR efforts. Reflecting this lack of integration are the continued narrow sectoral and disciplinary approaches taken by forest restoration projects, often leading to marginalisation of the most vulnerable populations, including through land dispossessions. This article aims to assess what lessons can be learned from other associated fields of practice for FLR implementation. To do this, 35 scientists came together to review the key literature on these concepts to suggest relevant lessons and guidance for FLR. We explored the following large‐scale land use frameworks or approaches: land sparing/land sharing, the landscape approach, agroecology, and socio‐ecological systems. Also, to explore enabling conditions to promote integrated decision making, we reviewed the literature on understanding stakeholders and their motivations, tenure and property rights, polycentric governance, and integration of traditional and Western knowledge. We propose lessons and guidance for practitioners and policymakers on ways to improve integration in FLR planning and implementation. Our findings highlight the need for a change in decision‐making processes for FLR, better understanding of stakeholder motivations and objectives for FLR, and balancing planning with flexibility to enhance social–ecological resilience.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W2972677262

DOI

10.1002/ldr.3448

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Forêt · Paysage

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3448
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W2972677262

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w139247035 · CITES
• openalex:w1494019382 · CITES
• openalex:w1546341007 · CITES
• openalex:w1548868585 · CITES
• openalex:w1551533759 · CITES
• openalex:w1557200796 · CITES
• openalex:w1896013598 · CITES
• openalex:w1967156257 · CITES
• openalex:w1975523136 · CITES
• openalex:w1981213426 · CITES
• openalex:w1985312850 · CITES
• openalex:w1999289743 · CITES
• openalex:w2027133828 · CITES
• openalex:w2029945928 · CITES
• openalex:w2034994370 · CITES
• openalex:w2058967873 · CITES
• openalex:w2062603909 · CITES
• openalex:w2062980459 · CITES
• openalex:w2075288099 · CITES
• Carbon, forests and the REDD paradox · CITES

2 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.