UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Research Priorities to Improve Future Environmental Water Outcomes

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.3389/fenvs.2017.00089

Auteurs

Avril Horne · J. Angus Webb · Erin L. O’Donnell · Angela H. Arthington · Michael E. McClain · Nick R Bond · Mike Acreman · Barry T. Hart · Michael J. Stewardson · Brian D. Richter · N. LeRoy Poff

Année déclarée

2017

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:15:47.076725+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:18:30.356933+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Colorado State University · Griffith University · IHE Delft Institute for Water Education · Murray Darling Basin Authority · Suez (Czechia) · The University of Melbourne · UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology · University of Canberra

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Significant progress in environmental flow management has occurred in recent years due to several factors. These include governments committing to environmental flow programs, significant progress in scientific understanding, and environmental flow assessment methods that are cognizant of stakeholder participation and co-design. However, there remain key challenges facing environmental water management. In this paper, we report on a horizon scanning exercise that identified the questions, which, if answered, would deliver much needed progress in the field of environmental water management. We distributed an online survey to ask researchers and practitioners in the field of environmental water management to identify the key questions. The authors then consolidated 268 submitted questions and organized them into key themes. The consolidated list was presented to a workshop of environmental water researchers and practitioners, where attendees were asked to review the questions, vote on the most important, and provide feedback on gaps, issues or overlaps. The breadth of issues facing environmental water management is captured by the six key themes into which questions were classified: (1) Ecological knowledge and environmental flow assessment methods (2) Adaptive management (3) Integrated management and river objectives (4) Knowledge transfer: applying best practice in a global context (5) Community knowledge and engagement, and (6) Active management. These questions provide a roadmap for research and management innovations that will improve the effectiveness of environmental flows programs.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W2775751302

DOI

10.3389/fenvs.2017.00089

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Fleuve / rivière

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00089
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W2775751302

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1021387833 · CITES
• openalex:w15031466 · CITES
• openalex:w1817717055 · CITES
• openalex:w1826601069 · CITES
• openalex:w1898854960 · CITES
• openalex:w1906337070 · CITES
• openalex:w1934222030 · CITES
• openalex:w1973758393 · CITES
• openalex:w1974663497 · CITES
• openalex:w1979103978 · CITES
• openalex:w1982901688 · CITES
• openalex:w1992731809 · CITES
• openalex:w1993412646 · CITES
• openalex:w1998683186 · CITES
• openalex:w2001091105 · CITES
• openalex:w2005392325 · CITES
• openalex:w2007734087 · CITES
• openalex:w2013020394 · CITES
• openalex:w2018897759 · CITES
• openalex:w2025357267 · CITES

2 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.