UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Supplementary Materials S1–S6: Regulatory Register, Coding Matrix, and Claim–Evidence Map for "Institutional Change and Selective Redistribution of Decision Rights in Indonesian Forest Governance"

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.34105242

Auteurs

Eno Suwarno

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

supplementary-materials

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:14:22.167437+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:14:22.167437+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

This item contains the supplementary materials (S1–S6) for a study of institutional change in Indonesian forest governance from 1870 to 2023. The study asks how successive legal reforms redistributed decision rights over forests among the central government, subnational governments, communities, and businesses. It traces seven regulatory episodes, from the colonial domain declaration of 1870 to the Job Creation lineage of 2020–2023. The materials document how the corpus was built, how focal instruments were selected and coded, and how each analytical claim in the article links to its evidence.The file is a single Excel workbook with seven worksheets:README: overview, counts, and definitions of codes.S1 – Method protocol: corpus construction, the two selection rules (eligibility criteria C1–C4 and the turning-point rule), the codebook for five decision-right domains (status and boundaries; access; management and disposition; benefit retention; review), the aggregation rule, the coding procedure, and the disclosure of AI-assisted support.S2 – Master register: 162 operational entries (161 unique instruments after one duplicate is reconciled), comprising 15 focal and 146 contextual instruments. Each entry records period, synopsis, analytical note, and the selection trace. A separate block lists 14 supporting instruments cited in the article but outside the bounded register.S3 – Focal instruments: legal status, key provisions, analytical role, evidence basis, and episode for the 15 focal instruments.S4 – Coding matrix: problem representation, governmental technology, mechanism of institutional change, empirical configuration, and before → after codes for the five domains, for each focal instrument.S5 – Supporting evidence and indicators: 18 supporting evidence entries (Table S5.1), plus access and recognition indicators with derived ratios (Table S5.2).S6 – Claim–evidence map: 15 analytical claims linked to focal evidence, supporting evidence, mechanism, configuration, scope conditions, and the relevant sections of the article. Sources are official legal texts (Staatsblad, statutes, government and ministerial regulations, Constitutional Court decisions), government performance data, and published scholarship. Indicators from BRWA and AMAN are cited through news reports of their releases. Instrument titles are given in the original language (Dutch or Indonesian); synopses and notes are in English.The register is purposive and bounded rather than an exhaustive census. Coding was done by a single coder; each code is traceable to the provision coded. Aggregate indicators differ in date, coverage, and reporting unit, so they show scale and direction only. Data after 2023 are used as post-period context and do not extend the analysed episodes.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7220664509

DOI

10.6084/m9.figshare.34105242

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Autre

Types déclarés par les sources

supplementary-materials

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Forêt

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34105242
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7220664509

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.