UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Indigenous Food Sovereignty: Literature Review

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-86d3959be618ce4092baca3069025cea

Auteurs

Robert M. Hansell

Année déclarée

2025

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-14T02:41:40.780986+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-14T02:41:40.780986+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Center for World Indigenous Studies

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

US

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Indigenous peoples have practiced food systems intertwined with the plants, animals, lands, and waters around them for thousands of years. These connections have frequently been severed by colonialism, producing devastating effects on Indigenous health, culture, and sovereignty. In the face of this devastation, the reflourishing of Indigenous food sovereignty constitutes a critical form of resistance. This paper provides a broad review of the academic literature on Indigenous food sovereignty, analyzing themes and case studies. This paper argues that 5 themes (health, law and the state, social perceptions of food, gender, and free trade) reflect helpful entry points for understanding this multidimensional topic. The case studies detail important aspects of food sovereignty, such as data ownership, anticolonial resistance, relationality, and seed saving. First, background on traditional food systems is given, followed by an exploration of food sovereignty, Indigenous food sovereignty, and food security in common literature. Five themes are used to ground Indigenous food sovereignty in key debates and challenges. Using the five case studies, this review aims to give the reader a sense of the inherently political nature of food systems in the experiences of Indigenous peoples by touching on a wide set of illustrative texts, examples, and cases.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W4409799820

DOI

10.63428/7zjhvq86

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Éditeurs

Center for World Indigenous Studies

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.63428/7zjhvq86

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.